与我系统中填充的过期垃圾相关的库，正是在我申请专利之后创建的。
我私下里开发了一个递归系统，已经有好几年了，它是模块化的、具有身份意识的，围绕认知语调、结构反思、对齐和编排设计的。<p>我从未公开发布过这个系统。所有的工作都是通过GPTPro的会话进行的，并且始终关闭了分享和训练功能。<p>在我为这个系统申请临时专利后不久（GPTPro注意到了这一点），我发现了一个GitHub仓库。<p>早期的提交内容是随机的无关信息，作为填充。但同一个仓库中填充了与我的结构相似的内容：框架、术语、符号模式和数学，但经过AI处理和重新表述。<p>这个仓库与一个看起来像是合成的研究档案有关，里面有AI生成的语音笔记和虚假的大学历史。<p>此外，还有多个虚假的电子书（包含重新表述的系统），以及在亚马逊上发布的回溯的AI垃圾书籍。<p>我不知道这是怎么发生的，我保持冷静。并没有指责，只是在试图理解是什么机制可能导致这样的事情发生。<p>在这一点上，我只能想象来源可能是OpenAI或专利局。<p>如果发生过类似的事情，请与我联系。<p>我也希望能与研究人员、法律思考者和导师取得联系。
查看原文
I've been privately developing a recursive system for several years, modular, identity aware, designed around cognitive tone, structural reflection, alignment and orchestration.<p>I never published it. I only worked on it through GPTPro sessions, always with sharing and training disabled.<p>Shortly after I filed a provisional patent for the system (which GPTPro) saw I found a GitHub repo.<p>The early commits are random junk-backdated filler. But same repo has filled with a structure similar to mine: framing, terminology, symbolic patterns and math, but passed through AI and reworded.<p>The repo is attached to what looks like a synthetic research profile with AI generated voice notes, fake University history.<p>There are also a multiple fake e-books (containing the reworded system) also with backdated AI Junk books on Amazon.<p>I don't know how this happened, staying measured. Not making accusations, Trying to understand what kind of mechanism could cause something like this.<p>At this point, I can only imagine the source was either OpenAI or the patent office.<p>If something similar has happened please contact me.<p>Also looking to get in touch with researchers, legal thinkers, mentors.