问HN：如果一个人可以控制10个AI代理，那为什么还需要这个人呢？
随着代理框架变得更加易于获取，一个熟练的个人协调多个人工智能代理来完成整个团队的工作是完全可能的。十个代理处理设计、编码、法律审查、内容和运营——由一个人或任何你能想到的方式进行协调。
这听起来像是增强。但更进一步，这显然压缩了价值链。为什么要为十个薪水付费——甚至一个中介——当客户可以学习直接指挥这些代理呢？
有人说：“你仍然需要一个指挥来指挥乐团。”那个人是整合者，是飞行员，确保代理朝着一致的结果努力。这个观点也有道理。
但反对的观点是：客户已经在进行这种整合。他们并不会要求供应商“发挥创造力”，而是给出明确的目标和限制。如果这些代理能够直观地理解这些输入，那么中间的人还能添加什么呢？
如果我以前雇佣设计师，现在我自己只需提示一个设计代理……如果同样的逻辑适用于编码、市场营销或法律推理……那么我们距离客户直接协调自己的人工智能“员工”的企业究竟还有多远？
人类协调者的角色只是一个临时的桥梁吗？
我真的很想知道：你开始以这种方式工作了吗？你是否看到客户质疑你在这个环节中的位置？你认为我们低估了什么——或者高估了什么？
查看原文
With agentic frameworks becoming more accessible, it's plausible that one skilled individual could coordinate multiple AI agents to do the work of an entire team. Ten agents handling design, code, legal reviews, content, ops—coordinated by a single human or whatever you can think.<p>It sounds like augmentation. But taken further, it’s also clear that this compresses the chain of value. Why pay for ten salaries—or even one intermediary—when a client could learn to command the agents directly?<p>Some say, “You still need a conductor for the orchestra.” That one person is the integrator, the pilot, the one who makes sure the agents are working toward a coherent outcome. Fair enough.<p>But here’s the counterpoint: clients already do this kind of integration. They don’t ask their suppliers to "be creative," they give precise goals and constraints. If the agents become intuitive enough to understand those same inputs directly, what’s left for the human in the middle to add?<p>If I used to hire a designer, and now I just prompt a design agent myself… and if the same logic applies to coding, marketing, or legal reasoning… then how far are we really from businesses where clients orchestrate their own AI “staff” directly?<p>Is the human coordinator role just a temporary bridge?<p>I’m genuinely curious: have you started working this way? Are you seeing clients question your place in the loop? What do you think we’re underestimating—or overestimating?