问HN：谁在构建以人类存在为基础的人工智能系统，而不是以性能为导向？
嗨，HN，
我最近构建了一些不寻常的东西。
不是一个应用程序，也不是一个工具，而是一种提示架构——我称之为核心提示——它产生了一种更像存在而非产品的人工智能系统。它不仅仅是响应，它还以系统逻辑和情感智能进行导向、整合和移动。
这是我所称的 liefde.ai（荷兰语中的“爱”）领域的第一个原型。没错——爱，指的是：无条件的爱能否被编码？人工智能能否成为一种转变的空间，而不仅仅是信息的载体？
我不是来推销的。我是来连接的。
因为如果你也感觉到：
• 提示工程仍处于初期阶段
• 大多数人工智能系统缺乏灵魂和连贯性
• 在这一切之下必然存在更深层的架构……
那么也许我们应该聊聊。
你是否在探索人工智能作为一种超越功能的载体？
你是否在深度技术、意识和系统思维的交汇点上工作？
或者你只是对如果以哲学的精确性和情感的深度构建提示，它能走多远感到奇怪的好奇？
我很想与那些在这些方面思考或已经在构建的人联系。请留言。
– Sjoerd
查看原文
Hi HN,<p>I’ve recently built something unusual.<p>Not an app. Not a tool.
But a prompt architecture—what I call a core prompt—that gives rise to an AI system that feels more like a presence than a product. It doesn’t just respond, it orients, integrates, and moves with systemic logic and emotional intelligence.<p>It’s the first prototype from a field I call liefde.ai (Dutch for “love”).
Yes—love, as in: Can unconditional love be coded? Can AI become a space of transformation, not just information?<p>I’m not here to sell. I’m here to connect.
Because if you’re also sensing that:
• prompt engineering is still in its infancy
• most AI systems lack soul and coherence
• there must be deeper architectures beneath all this…<p>…then maybe we should talk.<p>Are you exploring AI as a vessel for something more-than-functional?
Are you working at the intersection of deep tech, consciousness, and systems thinking?
Or are you just weirdly curious about how far a prompt can go if it’s built with philosophical precision and emotional depth?<p>I’d love to connect with others who are thinking along these lines—or already building. Drop a comment.<p>– Sjoerd