问HN：为什么我们无法对[已关闭]的帖子进行评论？
这种行为最近有变化吗？我记得最近还可以对[已关闭]的帖子上的现有评论进行回复，但现在这个功能似乎被移除了。<p>这些行为看起来对用户不太友好。如果帖子已经关闭，就无法在该帖子上发表新评论，这已经够糟糕了，但可以为审查目的辩解。然而，为什么我们不能回复那些与[已关闭]帖子相关的[有效]评论呢？仅仅因为它们附属于一个[已关闭]的帖子？更糟糕的是，旧的[有效]帖子被锁定，基本上让它们处于一种类似于碳化状态的冻结状态，这种状态与死亡无异，只是没有用户行为触发。<p>另一个相关的问题是，即使下方讨论的质量高于其他顶层评论，被下赞的回复及其下的高赞回复也可能被折叠或视为[已关闭]。<p>也许可以让用户在举报时必须选择一个复选框/单选按钮的理由，或者填写一个文本框？这可能对标题中的问题没有帮助，但Slashdot的投票理由和元审查系统捕捉了许多用户互动意图，而很少有平台重新审视过。最近我看到的表情符号反应可能是最接近的东西。<p>对HN上更有深度的互动有什么想法或建议吗？
查看原文
Did this behavior change recently? I recall being able to reply to existing comments on [dead] posts recently, but now that capability seems to have been removed.<p>These actions seem anti-user. If the post is already dead, no new comments can be made on the post, which is bad enough, but could be justified for moderation purposes. However, why can’t we reply to [live] comments, simply because the post they are attached to is [dead]? It’s bad enough that old [live] posts get locked, basically freezing them in carbonite, a state indistinguishable from death only in that it wasn’t triggered by user behavior.<p>A related issue is that downvoted replies with upvoted children may be collapsed or [dead] even if the downthread discussion is of higher quality than other top level comments.<p>Maybe make it so that user flags have to select a checkbox/radio button reason for the flag or fill in a text box? Would probably not help the issue in title, but slashdot’s vote reasons and meta-moderation system captured a lot of user interaction intent that few platforms have revisited. Emoji reactions would maybe be the closest thing I’ve seen lately.<p>Thoughts, suggestions for more thoughtful interactions on HN?