问HN：还有其他人对人工智能感到疲惫吗？
这不是一篇否认这个领域正在发展并且非常有趣的帖子，但现在的情况实在是太过于繁杂了。
每周都有几个新事物出现，大多数例子都是精心挑选的，基准测试也被夸大了等等。
我经营一家软件公司，尚未添加任何人工智能功能，主要是因为这些功能的实用性似乎低于我们大多数功能所追求的价值标准。
我个人使用ChatGPT进行随机搜索，以及Cursor和当时认为最好的模型，但即便如此，在日常使用中要从中获得有价值的东西也需要付出<i>很多</i>的努力。
当我看到一些初创公司在短短六个月内就发布了1000万美元的年经常性收入时，我感觉自己快要失去理智了。
我听说许多这些公司的风险投资者表示，客户流失率在15%到30%之间，而它们离盈利还很远，但增长速度却异常迅猛。
我是否应该屈服，添加另一个文本生成工具，像是本周的填空应用程序一样？
这让我觉得不太真诚，但即使是我认识和尊重的公司也在添加一些可疑的“代理”功能，而这些功能很少能正常工作。
不管怎样，你感觉怎么样？
查看原文
It’s not a post to deny that the field is moving and is very interesting to follow but it’s just become too much.<p>Every week there’s several new things, most examples are cherry picked, benchmarks are blown out etc.<p>I run a software company that has not added any AI features, mostly because the usefulness seems to fall below the bar for value that most of our features try to maintain.<p>I use ChatGPT personally for random searches and Cursor + whatever model is deemed best at the time but even with that it takes <i>a lot</i> of work to get something valuable out of it in day to day.<p>I feel like I’m losing my mind when I see startups posting 10m ARR numbers in just 6 months or whatever.<p>I’m hearing from VC’s churn is 15-30% in many of these companies and they’re far from profitable but the growth is just wild.<p>Do I succumb and just add yet another text generation that maps to an object like fill-in-the-blank app of the week?<p>It feels disingenuous but even companies I know and respect are adding questionable “agent” features that rarely work.<p>Anyway, how are you feeling?