如果人工智能无法编写代码,那它已经注定失败。
许多框架和库的时间正在流逝。<p>这并不是因为它们不好,也不是因为社区放弃了。<p>而是因为人工智能无法——或者说不愿意——在这些框架或库中进行编码。<p>如果GPT或Claude在你的框架/库上遇到困难,那么它可能已经变得无关紧要……即使它在技术上是出色的。<p>这意味着:
(1) 像React或Next.js这样流行且文档完善的框架将会蓬勃发展;
(2) 小众或过于复杂的工具,如果没有广泛的训练数据,可能不会长久存在。<p>对此我有些复杂的感受。一方面,这提高了效率,对生产力非常有利;另一方面,这似乎意味着创新可能在开始之前就被过滤掉了。<p>你怎么看?
查看原文
The clock is ticking for a lot of frameworks and libraries.<p>Not because they're bad. Not because the community gave up.<p>But because AI can't - or won't - code in them.<p>If GPT or Claude struggles with your framework/library, it might already be irrelevant... even if it's technically brilliant.<p>That means:
(1) Popular and well-documented frameworks like React or Next.js will thrive
(2) Niche or overly complex tools without wide training data probably won't stick around<p>I've got mixed feelings about this. On one side it's efficient and great for productivity. On the other it feels like innovation might get filtered out before it even starts.<p>What do you think?