当利润凌驾于社区之上：对Golang大会的观察
在审视几场知名的 Go（Golang）会议的演讲者阵容时，我注意到了一些反复出现的模式：
<p>受影响力驱动的演讲者选择：许多阵容年复一年地出现相同的熟面孔。尽管这些演讲者无疑才华横溢，但这限制了与观众分享的观点多样性。
<p>新演讲者机会有限：尽管偶尔会有新声音被纳入，但大多数演讲名额仍然归知名人士所有。
<p>缺乏区域和文化多样性：会议往往错失引入全球声音或区域贡献者的机会，他们能够为 Go 及其生态系统提供新鲜且有价值的视角。
<p>赞助商影响：企业赞助有时似乎会影响演讲者阵容和整体会议议程，模糊了技术讨论与市场营销之间的界限。
<p>缺乏非企业贡献者的代表性：许多会议过于关注 Go 的企业应用，常常忽视那些在大型公司之外推动 Go 增长和创新的开源贡献者或个人开发者。
<p>最终，看到更多有意识的努力将新人才带上舞台，代表更广泛的声音和经验，将是一种令人耳目一新的变化。
查看原文
While reviewing the speaker lineups at several prominent Go (Golang) conferences, I noticed some recurring patterns:<p>Speaker Selection Driven by Influence: Many rosters feature the same familiar faces year after year. While these speakers are undeniably talented, it limits the diversity of perspectives shared with the audience.<p>Limited Opportunities for New Speakers: Although new voices are occasionally included, the majority of speaking slots continue to go to well-known names.<p>Lack of Regional & Cultural Diversity: Conferences often miss the opportunity to bring in global voices or regional contributors who can offer fresh, valuable perspectives on Go and its ecosystem.<p>Sponsor Influence: Corporate sponsorships sometimes seem to shape the speaker lineup and the overall conference agenda, blurring the line between technical discussion and marketing.<p>Lack of Representation from Non-Enterprise Contributors: Many conferences focus heavily on the enterprise application of Go, while often neglecting the open-source contributors or the individual developers who are responsible for much of Go's growth and innovation outside of big companies.<p>Ultimately, it would be refreshing to see more intentional efforts to bring new talent to the stage, representing a broader range of voices and experiences.