请问HN:你们公司是如何适应使用大型语言模型(LLMs)进行招聘的?

2作者: Python3267大约 2 个月前原帖
随着大型语言模型(LLM)逐渐成熟,贵公司是如何适应这一新环境的?现在仅仅评估一个人的编程能力已经不够,我们需要评估他们的工程能力。根据我的经验,软件工程正在逐渐成熟,类似于其他工程领域。机械工程师不会自己铣削零件(当然,他们至少应该这样做几次,以理解加工的限制)。软件工程师需要检查代码是否“优秀”(机械工程师会测试他们的零件),然后围绕这些代码设计系统。就我所见,未来有两种发展方向: 1. 仅在现场进行面试,承担差旅费用 2. 测试系统设计能力和文化契合度 现场面试能够提供一个公平的竞争环境,面试者不需要为了“隐藏自己使用大型语言模型的能力”而竞争。 大家对此有什么看法?
查看原文
Now that llm&#x27;s are starting to get pretty good how has your company&#x27;s adapted to the new environment. It&#x27;s no longer good enough to see if someone&#x27;s good a programing, instead we need to screen if someone is good at engineering. In my experience Software Engineering is starting to mature like other forms of engineering. Mechanical Engineers don&#x27;t mill out their parts (Well they should at least a couple of times to understand the constraints of machining). SWE&#x27;s need to see if the code is &quot;good&quot; (Mech E&#x27;s test their parts) and then design the systems around them. As far as I can see there are two ways of going forwards.<p>1. Only do on sites and eat the travel expenses<p>2. Test for systems design and culture fit<p>On sites allow for a level playing field where interviewees don&#x27;t need to compete for the [best person hiding their llm use](https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;technology&#x2F;comments&#x2F;1j436it&#x2F;a_student_used_ai_to_beat_amazons_brutal&#x2F;).<p>What are people&#x27;s thoughts?