请问HN：知识已经过时。在人工智能时代，洞察力才是货币。
我正在开发一个名为“INK”的概念：洞察，而非知识。
在人工智能的时代，知识本身已经变得瞬时、无限且免费。从互联网到谷歌，再到现在的人工智能，获取信息不再是优势，而是基本要求。
但洞察是不同的。洞察意味着看到他人所忽视的模式。这是优势，是价值，是让你与众不同的东西。
未来属于那些将人工智能视为放大器而非捷径的人。利用它更清晰地看待问题、更深入地思考、创造和创新。
我正在围绕这个框架写一本书，并在这里公开记录这个缩写。
希望能得到诚实的反馈：
“INK”这个缩写是否清晰地传达了这个概念？
“洞察”和“知识”之间的区别是否清晰地引起共鸣？
你的直觉反应是什么？
我并不是在销售或推广任何东西，真心希望得到反馈和批评。
谢谢！
查看原文
I'm developing a concept called INK: Insight, Not Knowledge.<p>In the era of AI, knowledge itself has become instant, infinite, and free. From the internet, to Google, and now AI. Having access to information isn't an advantage anymore, it's table stakes.<p>But insight is different. Insight means seeing patterns others miss. It's the edge. The value. The thing that will set you apart.<p>The future belongs to people who use AI not as a shortcut, but as an amplifier. Leveraging it to see clearer, think deeper, create and innovate.<p>I'm writing a book around this framework and openly timestamping the acronym here today.<p>Would appreciate honest feedback:<p>Does the acronym "INK" clearly communicate the concept?<p>Does the distinction between "Insight" and "Knowledge" resonate clearly?<p>What's your gut reaction?<p>Not selling or promoting anything. Genuinely looking for signal and critique.<p>Thanks!