请问HN：像Astral这样的公司是如何在财务上可行的？
首先，我想说我非常喜欢 uv，并且已经将我所有的 Python 项目都改为使用它。它以透明且易于使用的方式简化了依赖管理。
然而，在阅读了这个讨论串（https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44357411）后，我开始想知道——这个名为“Astral”的公司背后到底是谁？
我查看了他们的介绍，内容听起来很不错，我对此表示支持。但他们毕竟是一家公司，我想他们肯定希望以某种方式盈利。否则，他们就会停止运营，而我不希望那样，因为我真的很喜欢 uv。
但我也想知道，他们是否有计划最终从我这个无辜的 uv 用户那里获取收益。依赖于 uv/Astral 是否是一种错误？还是我可以期待这种关系更像 GitHub（总体上还算满意，尽管它的可用性正在下降……）？
查看原文
First of all, let me start by saying that I love uv and have changed all my Python projects to use it. It simplifies dependency management in a transparent and easy-to-use way.<p>However, after reading this thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44357411), I began to wonder - who is this company 'Astral' behind all this?<p>https://astral.sh/about<p>I read their about, and it sounds great and I'm all for it. But they are still a company, and I presume they want to make money somehow. Otherwise they'll stop being a company, and I don't want that because I really like uv.<p>But I also want to know if there is some plan to eventually get money out of me, an innocent uv-user. Is it a mistake to become too reliant on uv/Astral? Or can I hope the relationship will be more like GitHub's (pretty happy overall, although it is becoming less usable...)