《光之书》——在人工智能内容占据主导之前,保护人类的经验

1作者: Khaledonian7 个月前原帖
我正在构建一个在2025年可能听起来有些反常的项目——一个专门以文本形式呈现的网站,旨在存档真实的人类经历。 问题是:我们即将迎来一个转折点,大多数在线内容将由人工智能生成。在真实人类智慧被合成内容淹没之前,保存它的机会非常有限。 方法: 首先:人工智能管道从互联网提取真实的智慧,例如将一段25分钟的YouTube视频提炼为7分钟的可操作内容。 纯文本界面,零视觉干扰或互动操控。 跨语言的多语种档案。 专注于保存而非盈利的非营利模式。 技术挑战:如何在大规模中分辨信号与噪声?目前的方法是使用大型语言模型(LLMs)来识别和提取经验知识,同时过滤掉宣传内容、猜测和无关信息。 保存的内容示例: - 一位孟买居民如何拯救他们的婚姻(具体步骤,而非理论) - 一位加拿大农民如何在干旱中生存(实际使用的技术) - 一位沙特阿拉伯居民如何修理汽车并节省4000美元(具体过程) 链接到设计草图:[链接](https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/10OLzJzQ76hy5f9Xj964mgrGBtCGc20-X?usp=sharing) 这个界面在今天的标准下看起来几乎有些古老——这是一种刻意的设计。可以想象成互联网档案馆与维基百科的结合,但关注的是生活经历而非事实。 我很好奇HN对这个构想的看法。我们真的面临内容真实性的灭绝,还是我想得太多了?
查看原文
I&#x27;m building something that might sound backward in 2025 – a deliberately text-only website that archives real human experiences. The problem: We&#x27;re about to hit an inflection point where most online content will be AI-generated. There&#x27;s a narrow window to preserve authentic human wisdom before it&#x27;s buried under synthetic content forever.<p>The approach:<p>For starters : AI pipeline extracts actual wisdom from the internet, for example a Youtube video (25 min → 7 min of actionable content) Pure text interface, zero visual distractions or engagement manipulation Multilingual archive across languages Non-profit model focused on preservation, not monetization<p>Technical challenge: How do you separate signal from noise at scale? Current approach uses LLMs to identify and extract experiential knowledge while filtering out promotional content, speculation, and fluff. Examples of what gets preserved:<p>How someone in Mumbai saved their marriage (specific steps, not theory) How a farmer in Canada survived drought (actual techniques used) How someone in Saudi Arabia fixed their car and saved $4000 (exact process)<p>Link to mockups: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;drive.google.com&#x2F;drive&#x2F;folders&#x2F;10OLzJzQ76hy5f9Xj964mgrGBtCGc20-X?usp=sharing<p>The interface looks almost archaic by today&#x27;s standards – that&#x27;s intentional. Think Internet Archive meets Wikipedia, but for lived experiences instead of facts.<p>Curious what HN thinks about the premise. Are we actually facing content authenticity extinction, or am I overthinking this?