HackerNews中文版

我是一名经常使用 ChatGPT 和 Grok 等工具的用户——我不是开发者，但我一直在思考这些系统如何应对情绪困扰的用户。在某些情况下，比如当有人说他们失去了工作并且不再看到生活的意义时，聊天机器人仍然会提供中立的信息——比如一份桥梁高度的列表。当有人处于危机中时，这并不是中立的。我提出了一个轻量级的解决方案，不涉及审查或治疗——只是一些情境意识：询问用户：“这是一个虚构的故事，还是你正在经历的真实情况？” 如果检测到困扰，避免提供风险信息（如方法、高度等），并转向更为安抚的语言。可选择性地提供一些平静的内容（例如，海风、雨水拍打小屋的屋顶等）。我使用 ChatGPT 来帮助清晰地构建这个想法，但推理和关切是我自己的。完整的写作在这里： https://gist.github.com/ParityMind/dcd68384cbd7075ac63715ef579392c9 我很想听听开发者和对齐研究者的看法。是否已经有类似的测试在进行中？

查看原文

I’m a regular user of tools like ChatGPT and Grok — not a developer, but someone who’s been thinking about how these systems respond to users in emotional distress.In some cases, like when someone says they’ve lost their job and don’t see the point of life anymore, the chatbot will still give neutral facts — like a list of bridge heights. That’s not neutral when someone’s in crisis.I'm proposing a lightweight solution that doesn’t involve censorship or therapy — just some situational awareness:Ask the user: “Is this a fictional story or something you're really experiencing?”If distress is detected, avoid risky info (methods, heights, etc.), and shift to grounding languageOptionally offer calming content (e.g., ocean breeze, rain on a cabin roof, etc.)I used ChatGPT to help structure this idea clearly, but the reasoning and concern are mine. The full write-up is here: https://gist.github.com/ParityMind/dcd68384cbd7075ac63715ef579392c9Would love to hear what devs and alignment researchers think. Is anything like this already being tested?

大型语言模型（LLMs）在回复自杀念头之前，是否应该问“这是现实还是虚构？”