还有谁对人工智能的强制推广感到厌倦吗?

4作者: lucideng7 个月前原帖
他们不会把人工智能强加到什么地方呢?我到处看到他们匆忙地将人工智能嵌入到各种东西中。Galaxy S24的电源按钮现在变成了双子座按钮。每个搜索引擎都有“人工智能建议”。甚至罗技也在其“Logi Options+”中提供人工智能工具,我只是想重新配置我的按钮,真是受够了。我并没有要求这个“由____人工智能驱动”的未来,如果你要求过,那真是太可耻了。 还有没有人觉得人工智能对人类来说是个净损失?搜索已经让我们变得懒惰,现在我们甚至不需要思考答案,只需复述人工智能所说的内容。连邮件都不看,只让人工智能总结一下可能是人工智能写的内容。 然后,关于人工智能失败的奇怪轻视。你可以把失败归咎于人工智能,但如果你得出了同样的结论/结果,那就是你的错。这已经变成了一种责任转移。指责机器比承担责任更容易吗? 环保主义者在哪里?人工智能的能耗是搜索的10倍(因此碳排放也是10倍)。这还不包括制造硬件和训练模型所需的资源和能量。我想不出任何设备或工具,人们会容忍能耗增加10倍来完成同样的任务。人们并不关心数据中心发生了什么,直到它在他们身边造成问题。 我发现人工智能在生成模板代码、单元测试等方面非常有用。它是完成某些工作的好工具。我不需要或想要它被强行应用到所有地方,因为每个产品经理和销售团队似乎都认为这是推动“增长因素”或其他无聊概念的好主意。
查看原文
What won&#x27;t they force AI into? Everywhere I look they have hastily shoehorned AI into something. The power button on a Galaxy S24 is now the Gemini button. Every search engine has &#x27;AI Suggestions&#x27;. Even Logitech ships AI tools with its &#x27;Logi Options+&#x27;, I just wanted to reconfigure my buttons FFS. I didn&#x27;t ask for this &#x27;Powered by ____ AI&#x27; future, shame on you if you did.<p>Anyone else get the feeling that AI is a net loss for humanity? Search already made us lazy, now we don&#x27;t even have to think about the answer, just regurgitate what the AI said. Don&#x27;t even read your email, just have AI summarize what an AI probably wrote.<p>Then there&#x27;s a strange dismissal of AI&#x27;s failures. You can blame the AI for a failure, but if you were to arrive at the same conclusion&#x2F;result, it would be your fault. It&#x27;s become some sort of ownership offloading. Easier to blame the machine than take responsibility?<p>Where are the environmentalists? AI uses 10x the energy (and thus 10x carbon emissions) as search. That doesn&#x27;t include the resources and energy to make the hardware and train the models in the first place. I can&#x27;t think of any device or tool where people would tolerate a 10x increase in energy usage to complete the same task. People don&#x27;t care what happens in the Datacenter until its next door to them causing problems.<p>I find it very useful for generating boilerplate code, unit tests, etc. It&#x27;s a great tool for doing certain work. I don&#x27;t need or want it shoved into everything because every Product Manager and Sales team seems to think it&#x27;s a good idea to drive &#x27;growth factors&#x27; or some other BS.