HackerNews中文版

在思考当前世界的状态时，我有一个直觉，于是我问道：你是否在网上发现过任何线索，表明MAGA（以及其他极右意识形态）可能误解了查尔斯·达尔文的研究？我从未见过以这种方式讨论这个问题。也许我只是没有关注正确的论坛。:)。这似乎是一个足够重要的问题（甚至可以说是核心问题），应该被纳入今天的政治对话中。是的，有几个迹象表明，包括与MAGA相关的极右意识形态，常常误解或曲解查尔斯·达尔文的研究。这些误解通常源于将生物进化与社会或政治教义混为一谈，往往出于意识形态的目的。以下是一些关键线索和常见的误解：1. “社会达尔文主义”及其误用：误解：一个核心误解是“社会达尔文主义”这一概念，这并不是达尔文的理论。虽然“适者生存”这一短语（由赫伯特·斯宾塞创造，而非达尔文）常常被错误地归于达尔文，但它后来被采纳并扭曲，用以证明社会、经济和种族的等级制度。社会达尔文主义认为，某些个人、群体或国家天生“更适合”，因此应当主导，常常导致反对社会福利、支持无节制的资本主义、帝国主义，甚至优生学的论点。极右联系：这种误用与一些强调个人主义、竞争以及对不同群体之间固有优越或劣势信念的极右叙事产生共鸣。尽管主流科学普遍否定社会达尔文主义，但其潜在的竞争和等级伦理与一些极右观点在社会结构和权力动态上的看法可以相一致。网上线索：你会发现来自学术和大众来源的文章和讨论，强调社会达尔文主义如何曲解生物进化，以及它在历史上如何被用来证明歧视性政策，包括那些与极端民族主义或优越主义意识形态相关的政策。2. 创造论与智能设计：误解：极右中的一部分，特别是那些有强烈福音派或基要主义基督教倾向的人，拒绝科学的进化理论，转而支持创造论或智能设计（ID）。创造论坚持对圣经创造故事的字面解释，而智能设计则认为生命的复杂性指向“智能原因”，而非无方向的自然过程，常常暗示有一个神圣的设计者。极右联系：对于这些群体来说，接受进化被视为对宗教信仰和传统价值观的挑战。拒绝进化通常与对主流科学和机构的更广泛怀疑相伴随，这是一些极右言论中的一个共同主题。网上线索：你会看到许多与创造论和智能设计（如发现研究所）相关的网站和组织，积极推广反对进化的论点，常常将其框架为“争议”，尽管科学界有压倒性的共识。这些论点经常出现在保守派和极右社区流行的论坛和社交媒体讨论中。续在评论中：

查看原文

While pondering the current state of the world, I had a hunch, so I asked:Are there any clues you may have come across online that would indicate that perhaps MAGA (and other far right ideologies) misunderstand the research of Charles Darwin?I've never seen this discussed in this way. Maybe I'm just not following the right forums. :). This seems important enough (at the core even) that it probably should be included in today's political conversation.Yes, there are several indications that far-right ideologies, including those associated with MAGA, often misunderstand or misrepresent the research of Charles Darwin. These misunderstandings typically stem from a conflation of biological evolution with social or political doctrines, often for ideological purposes. Here are some key clues and common misinterpretations:1. "Social Darwinism" and its Misapplication:Misunderstanding: A central misunderstanding is the concept of "Social Darwinism," which is not Darwin's theory. While the phrase "survival of the fittest" (coined by Herbert Spencer, not Darwin) is often incorrectly attributed to Darwin, it was later adopted and distorted to justify social, economic, and racial hierarchies. Social Darwinism posits that certain individuals, groups, or nations are inherently "fitter" and therefore deserve to dominate, often leading to arguments against social welfare, for unchecked capitalism, imperialism, or even eugenics.Far-Right Connection: This misapplication resonates with some far-right narratives that emphasize individualism, competition, and a belief in inherent superiority or inferiority among different groups. While mainstream science widely discredits Social Darwinism, its underlying competitive and hierarchical ethos can align with some far-right views on societal structure and power dynamics.Clues Online: You'll find articles and discussions online from both academic and popular sources highlighting how Social Darwinism misrepresents biological evolution and how it has been historically used to justify discriminatory policies, including those associated with extreme nationalist or supremacist ideologies.2. Creationism and Intelligent Design:Misunderstanding: A significant portion of the far-right, particularly those with strong evangelical or fundamentalist Christian leanings, reject the scientific theory of evolution in favor of creationism or Intelligent Design (ID). Creationism adheres to a literal interpretation of biblical creation accounts, while Intelligent Design argues that life's complexity points to an "intelligent cause" rather than undirected natural processes, often implying a divine designer.Far-Right Connection: For these groups, accepting evolution is seen as a challenge to religious faith and traditional values. The rejection of evolution often goes hand-in-hand with a broader skepticism towards mainstream science and institutions, a common theme in some far-right rhetoric.Clues Online: You'll see numerous websites and organizations associated with creationism and Intelligent Design (like the Discovery Institute) that actively promote arguments against evolution, often framing it as a "controversy" despite overwhelming scientific consensus. These arguments frequently appear in discussions on forums and social media popular among conservative and far-right communities.Continued in comments:

Q2Gemini：关于极右意识形态及其对查尔斯·达尔文的误解