问HN：为什么Claude在回答关于Claude Code的问题时表现得如此糟糕？
每次我在网络界面上询问Claude有关Claude Code的问题时，它给出的回答都非常无助。<p>一两周前，我询问了我遇到的329错误，它指向了一个不存在的状态页面。当它最终找到正确的状态页面时，我让它读取，结果它拒绝了。<p>刚才，我问是否有Claude Code与GitHub的集成。Claude给了我一个通用的“我没有具体信息”的回答，并建议查看官方文档。<p>相比之下，当我向ChatGPT提出完全相同的问题时，它在多个网站上进行了快速搜索，并给出了详细的答案，直接链接到Anthropic关于其官方GitHub集成的文档（甚至还提到了由于最近的新速率限制公告而需要考虑的自动化问题）。<p>这感觉是一个可以解决的问题。难道Anthropic不能利用自己的文档来提供更好的关于自己产品的答案吗？当他们的竞争对手提供的信息比Anthropic自己的AI更好时，真的让人感到沮丧。<p>这似乎是一个基本的产品集成问题。<p>还有其他人遇到过这个问题吗？
查看原文
Every time I've asked Claude (on the web interface) questions about Claude Code, it gives me really unhelpful responses<p>A week or two ago I asked about 329 errors I was getting, and it pointed me to a non-existent status page. When it finally found the right status page, I asked it to read it and it refused<p>Just now, I asked if there was a Claude Code integration with GitHub. Claude gave me a generic "I don't have specific information" response and suggested checking official docs<p>In contrast, when I asked ChatGPT the exact same question, it did a quick web search across multiple sites and gave me a detailed answer with direct links to Anthropic's own docs about their official GitHub integration (and even a comment about considerations of automation given their recent new rate limits announcement)<p>This feels like a solvable problem. Couldn’t Anthropic just RAG their own docs to provide better answers about their own products? It's frustrating when their competitor gives better information about Anthropic's tools than Anthropic's own AI does<p>Seems like a basic product integration issue<p>Anyone else run into this?