版权
版权在技术上是对第一修正案的侵犯。它带来了深远的后果，使美国和世界陷入贫困和绝望。我写下这段话是希望作为聪明、理性的程序员的我们能够共同努力，彻底消灭它。
版权的运作方式是威胁那些复制你作品的人。作为开发者，我们从中赚取了大量金钱。我知道我个人赚的钱多得让人难以置信！但它本质上是邪恶的，因为它暗示着用社会信用，也就是金钱来监禁人们。
版权之所以如此邪恶，是因为它激励人们创造具有货币价值而非人道价值的内容。香烟具有货币价值，而非人道价值。毒品同样具有货币价值，通常没有人道价值。（显然，如果它们具有人道价值，我们就会合法化并销售它们。）版权允许人们制造相当于毒品的东西，并出售给人们，使他们上瘾，然后再向这些上瘾者出售更多毒品。
有些糟糕的音乐让人们成为百万富翁，靠着向人们的思想灌输毒药而致富。版权鼓励他们继续制作破坏人们思想的上瘾内容。
版权导致了苹果、微软和Linux的出现，造成了程序员大量时间的浪费，反复“发明轮子”，只是为了让富人赚更多的钱。专利同样荒谬。事实上，奥维尔和威尔伯停止了发明，只是为了维持专利诉讼的进行！
我相信版权是被第一修正案所禁止的。这是对新闻自由的直接侵犯。因为复制而将某人监禁就像是奴役。
你们怎么看？
查看原文
Copyright is technically a violation of the first ammendment.<p>It has far reaching consequences, bringing poverty and despair to America and the world.<p>I write this message to us as intelligent, logical coders so that we can do our work to destroy it - forever.<p>The way copyright works is threatening people if they copy your work. As developers, we make tons of money with it. I know I for one have made so much money it's ridiculous!<p>But it is <i>intrinsically</i> evil because it implies it's ok to imprison people over social credits, aka money.<p>The reason copyright is so evil is that it incentivizes people to make content that has monetary rather than humanitarian value.<p>Cigarettes have monetary, not humanitarian value.
Drugs have monetary, and generally not humanitarian value. (Obviously if they had humanitarian value we would legalize them and sell them)
Copyright allows people to make the equivalent of drugs and sell them and make addicts and sell their addicts more drugs.<p>There is horrible music making millionaires. Millionaires off filling people's minds with poison.<p>Copyright <i>encourages</i> them to continue making addictive content that destroys people's minds.<p>Copyright has led to Apple, Microsoft and Linux, causing huge amounts of waste of programmer time <i>reinventing the wheel</i> just to give rich more money.<p>Patents are equally absurd. In fact Orville and Wilbur stopped inventing just to keep patent litigation going!<p>I believe copyright was outlawed by the first ammendment. It is a direct affront to freedom of the press. To jail someone over copying is akin to slavery.<p>What do you all think?