隐私、代码与未来

3作者: rasengan6 个月前原帖
今天我想与CypherPunk邮件列表分享我的信息,因为我觉得每个人都应该意识到我们所处的十字路口: Tornado Cash的开发者之一Roman Storm被判定为共谋经营未获许可的货币传输业务[1]。Tornado Cash 只是代码,它在以太坊虚拟机上自主运行。 然而,在2022年,美国政府将其指定为受制裁实体,使得美国公民以任何方式与之互动,包括仅仅接收来自Tornado Cash的币,都是非法的[2]。 这个案件及其判决使得编写能够实现隐私的开源代码成为犯罪行为。它使得从自主代码中接收交易成为犯罪。 技术变得越来越强大、去中心化,并且对社会的基础性作用愈加明显。伴随这种力量的是开放与控制、隐私与合规、创新与监管之间的紧张关系。 很容易忽视这些时刻,因为它们看起来遥远或抽象。但毫无疑问,它们设定了先例,塑造了文化,影响了我们这些在边缘构建的cypherpunks所相信的可能性或,确切地说,是允许的事物。 “如果我们希望拥有隐私,就必须捍卫自己的隐私。”——埃里克·休斯,《一个Cypherpunk的宣言》,1993年 今天是密码学、开源和数字权利在所谓自由之地的一个挫折[3]。我们退后了一步。 是时候向前迈出两步了。 加密战争从未结束。它们只是等到cypherpunks几乎消失。 但你们仍然在这里。 现在是崛起的时候。 - 安德鲁 [1] https://cointelegraph.com/news/tornado-cash-roman-storm-found-guilty-partial-verdict [2] https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20220808 [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Star-Spangled_Banner
查看原文
Sharing my message to the CypherPunk&#x27;s mailing list today, as I feel it&#x27;s pertinent for everyone to be aware of the crossroads we&#x27;ve reached:<p>Roman Storm, one of the developers of Tornado Cash, a smart contract on Ethereum designed to enable transactional privacy, has been found guilty of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business [1].<p>Tornado Cash is simply code. It runs on the Ethereum Virtual Machine, autonomously.<p>Yet, in 2022, the U.S. government designated it as a sanctioned entity, making it illegal for U.S. persons to interact with it in any capacity, including simply receiving coins therefrom [2].<p>This case, and its verdict, makes writing open source code that enables privacy a crime.<p>It makes receiving a transaction from autonomous code a crime.<p>Technology is becoming more powerful, more decentralized, and more foundational to society. With that power comes tension between openness and control, privacy and compliance, innovation and regulation.<p>It’s very easy to overlook these moments, since they feel distant or abstract.<p>But make no mistake, they set precedents.<p>They shape culture.<p>They influence what we, the cypherpunks building at the edge, believe is possible or, rather, permissible.<p>“We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any.” — Eric Hughes, A Cypherpunk’s Manifesto, 1993<p>Today is a setback for cryptography, for open source and for digital rights int he so-called land of the free [3]. We’ve taken one step back.<p>It’s time to take two steps forward.<p>The Crypto Wars never ended. They simply waited until the cypherpunks were all but gone.<p>But you are still here.<p>Now is the time to rise.<p>- Andrew<p>[1] https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cointelegraph.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;tornado-cash-roman-storm-found-guilty-partial-verdict<p>[2] https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ofac.treasury.gov&#x2F;recent-actions&#x2F;20220808<p>[3] https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Star-Spangled_Banner