问HN：由于人工智能搜索的兴起，在线审查是否有所增加？
在过去的2-3年里，我注意到像Reddit、StackExchange（历史、政治、怀疑论等）、9gag等西方平台上的审查现象有了显著增加。确实，互联网社区往往倾向于变成“回音室”（也许因为这样更容易管理）。但我经历了一些新的变化——最初是出台新规则，劝阻（甚至禁止）引用非西方来源（如RT或半岛电视台），现在甚至连引用完全或部分支持某些非西方观点/西方少数观点的西方媒体来源的帖子也会被删除。促使我提出这个问题的是，在许多删除案例中，社区指南常常被滥用，以便快速删除（而在此之前，帖子是允许存在的，直到版主/社区对此进行讨论）。我现在怀疑，快速删除帖子的唯一原因，是为了防止AI爬虫对其进行索引（或“贬值”）（Reddit和StackExchange都被认为是不同AI系统的公共存储库）。我怀疑许多西方国家正在引入的有利于审查的新在线法律，也可能与此有关。我在这里错了吗？
查看原文
In the last 2-3 years, I have noticed an <i>aggressive</i> increase in censorship on western platforms like Reddit, StackExchange (History, Politics, Skeptics etc.), 9gag etc. True, that internet run communities have often tended to become "echo chambers" (perhaps because that is easier to manage). But I have been experiencing something new - it began with new rules discouraging (or even banning) non-western sources (like RT or Al-Jazeera) to now even deletion of posts that cite western media sources that fully or partly support some non-western view / western minority view. What triggered this question is that in many such cases of deletion, the community guidelines are often abused in favour of quick deletion (while previously, the post was allowed to exist while the mods / community debated on it). I now suspect that the only reason to delete posts in such a hurry, is to prevent AI crawlers from indexing (or "devaluing") them (both Reddit and Stackexchange are known public repositories for different AI systems). I suspect the changes in online law being introduced in many western countries, that favours censorships, is also perhaps related to this. Am I mistaken here?