请问HN：是否应该公开标记活动？
关于这则故事[0]，提到对mRNA疫苗资金的削减，以支持活病毒疫苗，并在发布后几分钟内被标记为不当内容，我在想是否会有人支持将标记活动公开化？
我了解到，HN的代码库几乎是只写的，所以这可能是个高难度的要求，但我认为如果人们能够自己调查哪些账户在跳上故事并进行打压，这将有助于在这个全球动荡的时期增强对网站的信心。
无论你的政治倾向如何，这都是有用的，例如在以色列-巴勒斯坦等问题上。
就这个例子而言，有几种可能性：
- 人们厌倦了“政治”故事，因此出于无聊而进行标记
- 网站上活跃用户中存在一个主流的亲特朗普、反科学的多数
- 有活跃的影响力活动，利用虚假账户隐藏和阻止对科学持续攻击的讨论
最可能的答案是以上所有原因。但为什么这样的反言论活动（如标记）应该是私密的呢？这可能已经可以通过API实现，如果是这样，我很想了解更多信息。
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44961584
查看原文
Apropos this story[0] about cuts to mRNA vaccine funding in favor of live virus vaccine being flagged to death within mere minutes of posting I'm wondering if there would be support for flagging activity being made public?<p>It is my understanding that the HN code-base is pretty much write-only so it's probably a tall ask but I think it would help confidence in the site at this... turbulent time globally, if people could do their own investigation of which accounts are jumping on stories to kill them.<p>This would be useful irrespective of your political slant, e.g. on issues like Israel-Palestine.<p>For the example story there are a few possibilities:<p>- people are sick of 'political' stories and flag them out of tedium<p>- there is a prevailing pro-Trump, anti-science majority of active users on the site<p>- there are active influence campaigns using sock-puppet accounts to hide and prevent discussion of ongoing attacks on science<p>The most likely answer is all-of-the-above. But why should such anti-speech activity as flagging be private? This may already be possible via the API so I'd be interested to learn that if so.<p>[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44961584