HackerNews中文版

GPT-5 是一款强大的模型。但有一点是没人愿意大声说出来的：它彻底终结了提示工程作为一种可持续实践。经过精心调整的 GPT-4 的提示？完全失效。风格、逻辑、回答习惯？全部改变。公司们？被迫在一夜之间回滚或重新测试成千上万的提示。这不是进步，而是伪装成创新的技术债务。每一次新版本的发布都意味着要支付提示迁移税：重写、回归测试和重新培训团队。与此同时：用户正在失去信任——要么坚持使用旧模型，要么更换服务提供商。安全性令人堪忧——OWASP 已经将提示注入标记为首要的 LLM 风险，NIST 也持相同观点。供应商不断推出“最佳实践”，比如更长的分隔符或系统提示……这只是对结构性伤口的临时修补。这个循环是这样的：升级 → 崩溃 → 修补 → 再次崩溃 → 再次修补。在整个行业意识到这是一条死胡同时，还要多久？提示工程不是未来，而是一种陷阱。GPT-5 则让这一点变得异常清晰。

查看原文

GPT-5 is a beast. But here’s the thing nobody wants to say out loud: it just killed prompt engineering as a sustainable practice.Carefully tuned prompts from GPT-4o? Broken.Styles, logic, answer habits? All shifted.Companies? Forced to roll back or re-test thousands of prompts overnight.This isn’t progress. It’s technical debt disguised as innovation. Every new release means paying a Prompt Migration Tax: rewriting, regression-testing, and re-training teams.Meanwhile:Users are losing trust — sticking with old models or switching providers.Security is a joke — OWASP already flagged prompt injection as the #1 LLM risk, and NIST said the same.Vendors keep pushing “best practices” like longer separators or system prompts… band-aids on a structural wound.The cycle looks like this: upgrade → break → patch → break again → patch again. How long before the entire industry realizes this is a dead end?Prompt engineering isn’t the future. It’s a trap. And GPT-5 just made that painfully clear.

提示工程正在崩溃——GPT-5刚刚证明了这一点。