政府禁止自我保管加密货币，要求所有计算机设置后门（2035年）
这一切开始得很平静。各国政府并没有直接禁止加密技术或去中心化协议，而是施压于苹果、微软、谷歌、英特尔、AMD以及其他所有主要的芯片、操作系统和浏览器供应商，要求他们“遵守国家安全”。
第一阶段，人工智能后门：每一台新设备都配备了一个强制性的可信人工智能模块（TAM）。官方宣传它是用于反欺诈和儿童保护。实际上，TAM是一个驻留的人工智能代理，具有内核级的挂钩。它拦截机器上运行的每一个程序，扫描“危险数学”，并将“异常行为”上报。人们被告知这就像杀毒软件，但很少有人意识到它的能力超过了任何曾经设计的根套件。
第二阶段，旧设备的淘汰：起初，人们依然依赖他们的旧笔记本电脑、树莓派和离网服务器。但软件和浏览器的更新停止了。互联网服务提供商开始根据新的网络犯罪法律屏蔽来自“未合规设备”的流量。逐渐地，使用旧硬件进行在线交易的能力减少，人们被迫转向新的技术栈。
第三阶段，某些数学的禁令：随着TAM的普及，政府划定了界限。在未获得许可的钱包之外生成ECDSA或Ed25519密钥对成为重罪。运行类似零知识证明、同态加密或基于格的加密算法会立即被标记。即使在Python中尝试编写素数筛选算法也可能引发“可疑数学”警报。
人工智能不需要理解你的代码。它已经在数百万种加密模式上进行了训练。任何过于接近“禁忌数学”的东西都会在毫秒内被关闭。
第四阶段，受控经济：自我保管消失了。所有钱包都由国家批准的保管人发行。像USDC这样的稳定币成为商业的支柱，但每一笔交易都需通过TAM预先清算。“黑数学”如门罗风格的环签名被视为数字恐怖主义。发布开源隐私代码的开发者被指控与军火贩子同罪。
大多数公民适应了这种变化，许多人甚至不知道有什么不同。他们用手机支付，刷脸消费，认为世界变得更加安全。
地下世界：数学从未消亡。一些研究人员将离线设备走私到法拉第笼中，围绕“自由数学”计算建立社区。其他人则使用骰子、纸牌和物理随机性设计模拟加密，创造出超出TAM控制的密钥。一个全球地下网络逐渐形成，通过光盘、二维码纹身甚至记忆种子短语传递秘密。
他们被贴上极端主义者的标签，但他们认为自己是保护主义者，坚守数字仍然可以自由的理念。
令人遗憾的是，这与欧盟等地正在考虑的聊天控制措施并没有太大区别。在1990年代，美国曾将强加密视为“军火”，并禁止出口。以下是关于端到端加密战争的全球地图：https://community.qbix.com/t/the-global-war-on-end-to-end-encryption/214
查看原文
It started quietly. Governments didn’t outlaw cryptography or decentralized protocols outright. Instead they pressured Apple, Microsoft, Google, Intel, AMD, and every other major vendor of chips, operating systems, and browsers to "comply with national security".<p>Phase 1, the AI backdoor: Every new device shipped with a mandatory Trusted AI Module (TAM). Officially it was marketed as anti-fraud and child protection.
In reality, TAM was a resident AI agent with kernel-level hooks. It intercepted every program running on the machine, scanned for "dangerous math", and reported "anomalous behavior" upstream. People were told it was like antivirus. Few realized it was more powerful than any rootkit ever devised.<p>Phase 2, obsolescence of the old machines: At first people clung to their older laptops, Raspberry Pis, and off-grid servers. But updates for software and browsers stopped. ISPs began blocking traffic from “non-compliant devices” under new cybercrime laws. Slowly, the ability to transact online with older hardware dwindled, and people were forced onto the new stack.<p>Phase 3, The ban on certain math: With TAM installed everywhere, governments drew the line. Generating ECDSA or Ed25519 keypairs outside a licensed wallet became a felony. Running algorithms that resembled zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption, or lattice-based crypto flagged you instantly. Even trying to code a prime sieve in Python could raise a “suspicious math” alert.<p>The AI didn’t need to understand your code. It had been trained on millions of cryptographic patterns. Anything too close to “forbidden math” was shut down in milliseconds.<p>Phase 4, The controlled economy: Self-custody vanished. All wallets were issued by state-approved custodians.
Stablecoins like USDC became the backbone of commerce, but every transaction was pre-cleared through TAM.
"Black math" like Monero-style ring signatures was criminalized as digital terrorism.
Developers who published open-source privacy code were charged the same as arms traffickers.<p>Most citizens adjusted. Many never knew the difference. They tapped their phones, paid with their faces, and believed the world was more secure.<p>The underground: Well, math never dies. Some researchers smuggled offline devices into Faraday cages, building communities around "free math" computing. Others designed analog cryptography using dice, cards, and physical randomness to create keys beyond the reach of TAM. A global underground grew, passing secrets on optical disks, QR tattoos, and even memorized seed phrases.<p>They were labeled extremists, but they thought of themselves as preservationists, keeping alive the idea that numbers could still be free.<p>The sad part is, this isn't that far off from what is being contemplated with Chat Control in EU, etc. In the 1990s, strong encryption itself in the US was considered "munitions" and prevented from export. Here is a global map of the war on end-to-end encryption: https://community.qbix.com/t/the-global-war-on-end-to-end-encryption/214