问HN：自愿身份验证以提供更好的服务。你会使用吗？
我一直在思考各种在线社区中的信号与噪声问题。许多的管理负担和用户挫败感似乎都源于那些在完全匿名的保护伞下进行恶意行为的喷子、垃圾信息和不良行为者。
这纯粹是一个思维实验，而不是产品推介：
如果某些服务（例如市场、社交媒体、专业人士的小众论坛、严肃出版物的评论区）提供一种严格自愿的“认证”模式，你会使用吗？
在这种情况下，你只需通过一个可信的第三方验证一次身份，这将使你能够进入这些更高信任度的空间。你的真实姓名不一定会公开，但你的账户将与一个独特的真实身份相联系。
理论上的好处是可以显著减少诈骗、垃圾信息和恶意行为，从而提升互动质量。显而易见的缺点是隐私的权衡。
你会考虑进行这样的权衡吗？如果会，具体在什么条件下？
查看原文
I've been thinking about the signal-to-noise problem in various online communities. So much of the moderation overhead and user frustration seems to stem from trolling, spam, and bad-faith actors operating behind a shield of complete anonymity.<p>This is purely a thought experiment, not a product pitch:<p>If certain services (e.g., marketplace, social-media, a niche forum for professionals, a comments section on a serious publication) offered a strictly voluntary, opt-in "verified" mode, would you use it?<p>In this scenario, you'd verify your identity once with a trusted third party, and this would grant you access to these higher-trust spaces. Your real name would not necessarily be public, but your account would be linked to a unique, real person.<p>The theoretical benefit would be a dramatic reduction in scams, spam, and trolling, leading to a higher quality of interaction. The obvious downside is the privacy trade-off.<p>Would you ever consider making that trade? If so, under what specific conditions?