HackerNews中文版

让我们明确一点，OpenAI的模型非常出色。GPT-5已经能够解决我无法让其他模型处理的问题。对此，我表示赞赏。但作为一个开发者的平台，ChatGPT简直是个笑话。我正盯着它刚生成的一个庞大文件，却无法将其折叠。这是一个基本功能，可能只需要10行JavaScript代码，就能让这个工具变得无比易用。相反，我的中指因为不停滚动而感到疲惫，甚至开始考虑用它做一些更阴暗的事情。这不仅仅是一个小烦恼；它是一个更大问题的症状：OpenAI正在依赖早期的成功，完全忽视了开发者的体验。与此同时，竞争对手正在抢占他们的市场。我看了看Claude的Artifacts系统，发现它远远领先。显然，其他公司实际上在考虑开发者的工作流程。而OpenAI似乎过于自满，以至于忘记了人们实际上需要去“使用”这个工具。因此，尽管他们构建了一些最强大的模型，但却未能建立一个尊重开发者时间和工作流程的平台。在服务开发者社区方面，他们并不是一家严肃的公司。总结：我的手指很痛……至少，你们能不能不要强迫我们每次响应都滚动数百次？

查看原文

Let's be clear, OpenAI's models are phenomenal. GPT-5 is already solving problems I couldn't get any other model to touch. For that, kudos.But as a platform for developers, ChatGPT is a joke.I'm staring at a massive file it just generated, and I can't collapse it. This is a basic feature, maybe 10 lines of JavaScript, that would make the tool infinitely more usable. Instead, my middle finger is getting a workout from all the scrolling, and I'm starting to consider using it for something more sinister.This isn't just a minor annoyance; it's a symptom of a larger problem: OpenAI is coasting on its early success and completely ignoring the developer experience. Meanwhile, competitors are eating their lunch.I look at Claude's Artifacts system and it's miles ahead. It's clear other companies are actually thinking about the developer's workflow. It feels like OpenAI is so high on their own supply they've forgotten that people actually have to use the thing.So, while they've built some of the most powerful models, they are failing to build a platform that respects a developer's time and workflow. They are not a serious company when it comes to serving the developer community.TL;DR My fingers hurt ... at the very least, can you stop forcing us to scroll hundreds of times per response?

OpenAI 不是一家严肃的公司。