问HN：资本翻转税制能否偿还美国债务？
经过一年多的迭代，我发布了更新版的PAS税收计划，这是一项超越党派的提案，旨在用基于资本的融资模型取代现行税制。
目标是在不采取紧缩政策、新增税收或引发通货膨胀的情况下，使美国财政实现可持续，同时建立一个奖励生产力、创新和储蓄的国家框架。
核心机制
• 每周工资贡献（例如600美元）通过联邦储备银行的储备银行原则进行转换 → 产生5400美元的新资本。
• 一半返还给工人，另一半则分配给国家预算和社会保障信托基金。
• 每位参与者获得10%的年度资本回报，将个人收入与国家资本增长相结合。
• 传统税收（如所得税、企业税、工资税、资本利得税等）被取消。
债务与主权模型
• 美国最富有的250人向联邦公共债务注入资本和主权股权。
• 美国最贫困的250个县通过主权财富基金（SWF）获得资本转换权，以解决学生贷款、消费债务和州政府负债。
• 用基于股权的价值创造取代杠杆收购——资本和所有权保持在国内。
结果
• 美国从借贷转向自我融资。
• 通过内部资本化偿还公共债务。
• 公民和企业获得直接的资本回报，而不是税收退款。
• 激励机制对齐：创造价值的人分享国家的收益。
在经过HN社区的仔细考虑和批评后，我将发布完整计划！
——
HN提问
1. 您认为以这种方式转换工资资本存在哪些宏观经济或技术缺陷？
2. 联邦储备和国税局的双重系统能否利用数字基础设施或代币化储备进行大规模管理？
3. 基于股权的债务偿还（最富有的250人 / 最贫困的250个县）在政治和法律上是否可行？
4. 我们如何通过现有的主权财富基金或州级试点来试点这一方案？
感谢任何深思熟虑的批评，特别是来自对系统性改革感兴趣的经济学家、工程师和政策思想者的意见。
查看原文
After more than a year of iteration, I’ve released an updated version of the PAS Tax Plan, a post-partisan proposal designed to replace the current tax system with a capital-based funding model.<p>The goal is to make the U.S. fiscally solvent without austerity, new taxes, or inflation, while creating a national framework that rewards productivity, innovation, and savings.<p>Core Mechanism
• Weekly payroll contributions (e.g., $600) are flipped by the Federal Reserve through reserve banking principles → $5,400 in new capital.
• Half is returned to the worker, the other half split between the National Budget and Social Security Trust Funds.
• Every participant receives a 10% annual capital return, aligning personal income with national capital growth.
• Traditional taxes (income, corporate, payroll, capital gains, etc.) are eliminated.<p>Debt & Sovereign Model
• The Top 250 wealthiest Americans contribute capital infusions and sovereign equity allocations to retire the federal public debt.
• The Bottom 250 U.S. counties receive capital-flipping authority through a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) to resolve student loans, consumer debt, and state liabilities.
• Replaces leveraged buyouts with equity-based value creation — capital and ownership stay domestic.<p>Outcomes
• U.S. transitions from borrowing to self-financing.
• Public debt paid down through internal capitalization.
• Citizens and enterprises receive direct capital returns instead of tax refunds.
• Incentives are aligned: those who create value share in national upside.<p>I will post the full plan after careful consideration and critique from the HN community!<p>⸻<p>Questions for HN<p>1. What are the macro-economic or technical flaws you see in flipping payroll capital this way?<p>2. Could a Fed-IRS dual system manage this at scale using digital rails or tokenized reserves?<p>3. Would equity-based debt retirement (Top 250 / Bottom 250) be politically and legally feasible?<p>4. How might we pilot this through an existing SWF or state-level trial?<p>Appreciate any thoughtful critique — especially from economists, engineers, and policy thinkers interested in systemic reform.