问HN:2025年的“竞争公平”是什么样的?

1作者: seattle_spring2 天前原帖
在“谁在招聘”的帖子中,许多职位列表提供了薪资范围,但它们的股权激励几乎都只是简单地表示“具有竞争力的股权”。我的经验表明,这在不同公司之间可能意味着截然不同的事情,即使是在相似的融资阶段提供的类似报价中。 鉴于过去几年工作市场发生了很大变化,我很好奇现在的“具有竞争力的股权”是什么样的。我特别想了解在不同融资阶段的初创公司(从A轮到大约E轮:基本上是任何仍然以“百分比”而非“现金价值”来衡量ISO股权的公司规模)以及不同级别的全栈软件工程师(从入门级到首席工程师)中的情况。 我并不是特别在寻找“人工智能”相关的职位,尽管我承认我对此有些好奇。
查看原文
Many of the listings on the &quot;Who is Hiring&quot; posts give a salary range, but their equity incentives almost all just say something along the lines of &quot;competitive equity.&quot;<p>My experience suggests that this can mean wildly different things to different companies, even for similar offers at similar stages of funding.<p>Given the jobs landscape has changed quite over the last few years, I&#x27;m curious what &quot;competitive equity&quot; looks like nowadays. I&#x27;m specifically curious about it in the context of startups at different stages of funding (A through ~E: basically any company size that still measures ISO equity in &quot;percent&quot; over &quot;cash value&quot;), and for various levels of full-stack software engineers (Entry-level through Principal).<p>I&#x27;m not so much looking for &quot;AI&quot;-specific offers, though I admit I am a bit curious.