请问HN：为什么Cursor和Windsurf可以不为他们的模型进行署名？
Windsurf的SWE-1.5非常出色，我也听说Cursor的型号表现不错。不过，我心中有一个挥之不去的感觉：使用基础模型而不给予信用是不可接受的。我知道他们在后期训练和优化推理方面做了很多工作，但使用像大型语言模型（LLM）这样重要的工具却不给予任何信用，感觉非常不妥。我想问的是，这种做法怎么能被认为是合理的，无论许可证允许什么。
查看原文
Windsurf's SWE-1.5 is really good, and I've heard good things about Cursor's model too.<p>However there's this nagging feeling I just can't shake: using the base models without credit is not OK.<p>I know they've done some post-training and a lot of work optimizing the inference, but to use something as substantial as an LLM and not even credit them feels super wrong.<p>I guess my question is how is this OK, regardless of what the licenses allow.