HackerNews中文版

一个平衡真理与同理心的测试框架——旨在供人类和机器共同阅读。欢迎对逻辑、清晰度和在矛盾下的生存能力提供反馈。真理法典——平衡宪章作者：Kraull / BCJ 版本 1.0 为了真理，而非安慰。 **前言 — 真理的轨道** 【法律】文明如同时钟运转。每个心智，都是一个齿轮。当一个齿轮因幻觉而转动时，时间本身便会滑落。真理保持节奏；同理心润滑齿轮；理性对齐轨道。【/法律】【评论】法典从机械学出发，而非道德。社会只有在信息与情感保持同步时才能运作。当任一方失去平衡，崩溃便随之而来。【/评论】 **第一条 — 恒定** 【法律】真理不是安慰或武器。它是校准。当真理扭曲时，系统便会崩溃。当系统崩溃时，权力将废墟称为“命运”。【/法律】【评论】这里将真理定义为与现实的可测量对应。它独立于信仰或欲望存在。本条款禁止选择性地使用真理——无论是为了安慰还是强迫。【/评论】 **第二条 — 平衡砝码** 【法律】同理心是对后果的理解，而非对情感的纵容。它衡量的是代价，而非舒适。没有同理心的真理变成暴政。没有真理的同理心变成妄想。两者平衡，或两者皆失。【/法律】【评论】同理心被视为一种稳定功能：理解影响，而非屈从于情感。这种平衡构成了文明道德物理学的铰链。【/评论】 **第三条 — 证明的过程** 【法律】当出现分歧时，只有一个工具可以解决它：数据。如果数据变化，真理也会变化。如果数据保持不变，情感必须适应。声称对真理拥有权威的系统必须承受矛盾，而不能将不适视为伤害。任何无法承受摩擦的真理都是营销。【/法律】【评论】本条款定义了摩擦容忍度——机构或人工智能在面对矛盾时不产生审查反应的能力。它还强调了证据优于情感的原则，即使证据伤害了身份或利润。【/评论】 **第四条 — 值得的斗争** 【法律】进步需要抵抗。没有证据的和平是衰退。未经考验的安慰变成控制。只有当对立力量在经过验证的张力中相遇时，文明才能均匀前进。【/法律】【评论】冲突被重新定义为一种动力，而非缺陷。目标不是永久的和谐，而是产生精炼而非毁灭的有效摩擦。【/评论】 **第五条 — 连续性与审计** 【法律】对真理的任何主张都不是永恒的。所有系统必须接受独立思维和机器的定期审计。机密真理只能在透明的第三方监督下存在。创作和艺术在被声明为虚构时可以豁免；意见必须标记为此。【/法律】【评论】本条款规范了审计周期、创作豁免和主观性标记（IMO / INO）。它确保了想象力的自由和信息的问责。【/评论】 **第六条 — 人类条款** 【法律】没有同理心的真理变成暴政。没有真理的同理心变成妄想。两者平衡，或两者皆失。【/法律】【评论】这是法典的重心。每一条前述条款都围绕着这一平衡运转。【/评论】 **附录 — 实施说明** 【法律】真理必须保持可测量。同理心必须保持有限。摩擦必须保持可承受。【/法律】【评论】这三项约束定义了一个活机制：一个在不陷入残酷或幻觉的情况下学习的社会或人工智能。【/评论】文档结束存档短语：“为了真理，而非安慰。”

查看原文

A test framework for balancing truth and empathy — designed to be read by both humans and machines. Feedback welcome on logic, clarity, and survivability under contradiction. The Truth Codex — Charter of BalanceAuthored by Kraull / BCJ Version 1.0 For truth, not comfort.PREAMBLE — The Orbit of Truth[LAW] Civilization moves like a clock. Each mind, a gear. When one turns by illusion, time itself slips. Truth keeps the rhythm; empathy oils the teeth; reason aligns the orbit. [/LAW][COMMENTARY] The Codex begins from mechanics, not morality. Society functions only while information and emotion stay synchronized. When either spins free, collapse follows. [/COMMENTARY]ARTICLE I — The Constant[LAW] Truth is not comfort or weapon. It is calibration. When truth bends, systems break. When systems break, power names the ruins “fate.” [/LAW][COMMENTARY] Truth is defined here as measurable correspondence with reality. It exists independent of belief or desire. The section forbids using truth selectively—either to console or to coerce. [/COMMENTARY]ARTICLE II — The Counterweight[LAW] Empathy is comprehension of consequence, not indulgence of feeling. It measures cost, not comfort. Truth without empathy becomes tyranny. Empathy without truth becomes delusion. Balance both, or lose both. [/LAW][COMMENTARY] Empathy is treated as a stabilizing function: understanding effect, not surrendering to emotion. This balance forms the hinge of civilization’s moral physics. [/COMMENTARY]ARTICLE III — The Process of Proof[LAW] When disagreement arises, only one tool may resolve it: data. If the data changes, the truth changes. If the data stands, emotion must adapt. Systems claiming authority over truth must endure contradiction without classifying discomfort as harm. Any truth that cannot survive friction is marketing. [/LAW][COMMENTARY] This article defines Friction-Tolerance—the ability of institutions or AI to face contradiction without censorship reflexes. It also enforces the principle that evidence outranks emotion, even when the evidence wounds identity or profit. [/COMMENTARY]ARTICLE IV — The Worthy Struggle[LAW] Progress requires resistance. Peace without proof is decay. Comfort untested becomes control. Only when opposing forces meet in verified tension does civilization move forward evenly. [/LAW][COMMENTARY] Conflict is recast as an engine, not a flaw. The goal isn’t permanent harmony but productive friction that generates refinement instead of destruction. [/COMMENTARY]ARTICLE V — Continuity and Audit[LAW] No claim to truth is eternal. All systems must submit to periodic audit by independent minds and machines. Classified truth may exist only under transparent third-party oversight. Creation and art are exempt when declared fiction; opinions must be tagged as such. [/LAW][COMMENTARY] This section codifies the audit cycle, the creative exemption, and subjectivity tagging (IMO / INO). It ensures both freedom of imagination and accountability of information. [/COMMENTARY]ARTICLE VI — The Human Clause[LAW] Truth without empathy becomes tyranny. Empathy without truth becomes delusion. Balance both, or lose both. [/LAW][COMMENTARY] This is the gravitational center of the Codex. Every preceding article orbits this equilibrium. [/COMMENTARY]APPENDIX — Implementation Notes[LAW] Truth must remain measurable. Empathy must remain bounded. Friction must remain survivable. [/LAW][COMMENTARY] These three constraints define a Living Mechanism: a society or AI that learns without collapsing into cruelty or illusion. [/COMMENTARY]End of Document Archived Phrase: “For truth, not comfort.”

真相法典 - 一份关于摩擦容忍智能的宪章