请问HN：通过GitHub贡献招聘工程师——请展示你的工作流程
探讨技术招聘在实践中是如何进行的，以及我们如何谈论这一过程。
如果你曾经招聘过工程师，并且GitHub是你评估的一部分：
- 你具体查看了哪些内容？
- 每位候选人你花了多少时间？
- 这是否改变了你的招聘决定，还是仅仅确认了你原本的想法？
如果你是一名因GitHub活动而被联系的工程师：
- 你认为是什么吸引了他们的注意？
- 是你自己的项目、对他人的贡献，还是其他什么？
我见过各种说法，从“星标的仓库告诉我他们的兴趣”到“我查看了他们过去六个月的提交记录”。我个人发现查看某一领域多个仓库的贡献很有用，但我很好奇其他人实际上依赖于哪些信号，而不是仅仅在招聘中做表面功夫。
查看原文
Exploring how technical hiring happens in practice vs how we talk about it happening.<p>If you've hired engineers where GitHub was part of your evaluation:<p>- What specifically did you look at?<p>- How much time did you spend per candidate?<p>- Did it change your hiring decision, or just confirm what you already thought?<p>If you're an engineer who's been contacted because of GitHub activity:<p>- What do you think caught their attention?<p>- Was it your own projects, contributions to others, or something else?<p>I've seen everything from "starred repos tell me their interests" to "I read through their last 6 months of commits". Personally found it useful to look at contributions across multiple repos in a domain, but curious what signals others actually rely on vs what's just hiring theater.