Arduino的死亡
关于高通为何会为Arduino支付如此高昂的费用，这里有很多猜测。我相信这个问题在Limor Freid（AdaFruit的LadaAda）在她的LinkedIn帖子中已经得到了回答，链接在这里：https://www.linkedin.com/posts/adafruit_opensource-privacy-techpolicy-activity-7396903362237054976-r14H
我知道很多人对LinkedIn避之唯恐不及，但关键在于高通的新“服务条款”明确禁止逆向工程，声称对提交到平台的任何内容拥有知识产权，并声称有权出于几乎任何目的使用与连接到Arduino的账户相关的所有数据。Limor对此进行了更详细的阐述，但归根结底，我同意她的看法，这将是Arduino的终结。
查看原文
There was a lot of speculation here about <i>why</i> Qualcomm would pay so much for Arduino. I believe that question has been answered by Limor Freid (LadaAda of AdaFruit) in her LinkedIn post here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/adafruit_opensource-privacy-techpolicy-activity-7396903362237054976-r14H/<p>I know a lot of people avoid LinkedIn like the plague, but the two key bits are that Qualcomm's new "Terms of Service" explicitly disallow reverse engineering, claim IP ownership of anything submitted to the platform, and claim a right to use any and all data associated with accounts connected to Arduino for pretty much any purpose they want. Limor goes into more detail but at the end of the day I agree with her assessment that this will be the end of Arduino.