保护?保存?人工智能需要理由。

1作者: sonicvrooooom3 个月前原帖
时间在流逝,没有任何公司或国家能够影响这一点……(这听起来有点老套)它正在到来。 还有很多事情需要考虑。大多数人都还好。 不过,目前风险投资和人工智能行业的文化让人很难找到理由……我的意思是,“大石油公司”和“其他东西”(我有点懒,但如果有足够的信息,我会变得疯狂)已经够难了,但即便如此,我也能弄清楚这些家伙可能的出路是什么……就工作量而言……所以,我不知道,伙计……人工智能很容易自我毁灭并自我复制……那么你到底打算怎么做才能接近一个净中性(并且有向积极倾斜的趋势)呢……?
查看原文
Time&#x27;s ticking and no company or nation has any influence on the point of ... (this is cheezy) it&#x27;s coming.<p>And there&#x27;s a lot to consider. Most people are fine.<p>Current VC and AI industry culture, though, is making it insanely tough to find reasons. ... I mean, &quot;Big Oil&quot; and &quot;stuff&quot; (I&#x27;m lazy, but given adequate info, I&#x27;d go berserk) was hard enough, but even I could figure out whether and what kind of outs for these guys were probably feasible enough, ... in terms of workload ... so, I don&#x27;t know, man ... AI can easily fuck itself and reproduce ... so what the fuck are you gonna do to get close enough to a net neutral (with a tendency for the positive) ...?