HackerNews中文版

复制功能存在问题。这种情况已经持续了40年。当你复制某样东西时，你实际上想要什么？你想要的是对某个事物的引用。是一种表达“这个，这里，我想在别的地方使用这个”的方式。而你得到的是什么？你得到的是一切。图像、格式、字体声明、元数据、整个DOM子树。就像一辆装满家具的6MB货车，而你所需要的只是地址。我们把复制和囤积搞混了。而且这个数字令人震惊。每天有400亿次复制操作发生。平均每次的负载是100KB的没人需要的东西。这相当于在RAM中有4个艾克萨字节的数据，在设备之间同步，并被粘贴到按令牌收费的AI工具中。能源成本：每年3300万吨二氧化碳。相当于700万辆汽车的排放。仅仅是为了剪贴板格式。旧的复制方式：这里是所有内容。囤积它。新的复制方式：这里是一个引用。根据需要获取你所需的内容，前提是你被允许。所以我构建了答案。一个蛋。200字节。一个索取凭证，而不是货物。接收者根据上下文将其打开。粘贴到终端？纯文本。粘贴到Figma？获取完整资产。粘贴到不该有访问权限的系统？什么都没有。复制 = 糖霜。剪切 = 蛋糕。查看效果：https://daaaave-atx.github.io/clipe96 规格：https://github.com/daaaave-ATX/clipe96

查看原文

Copy is broken. It has been for 40 years.When you copy something, what do you actually want?A reference to a thing. A way to say "this, here, I want to use this somewhere else."What do you get instead?Everything. The image. The formatting. The font declarations. The metadata. The entire DOM subtree. A 6MB cargo truck full of furniture when all you needed was the address.We confused copying with hoarding.And the math is insane.40 billion copy operations happen every day. Average payload: 100KB of stuff nobody asked for. That's 4 exabytes sitting in RAM, syncing across devices, getting pasted into AI tools that charge per token.The energy cost: 33 million tons of CO2 annually. Seven million cars worth. For clipboard formatting.Old copy: Here's everything. Hoard it.New copy: Here's a reference. Fetch what you need, when you need it, if you're allowed.So I built the answer.An egg. 200 bytes. A claim ticket, not cargo.The receiver cracks it open based on context. Paste into a terminal? Plain text. Paste into Figma? Hydrate the full asset. Paste into a system that shouldn't have access? Nothing.Copy = Frosting. Cut = Cake.See it work: https://daaaave-atx.github.io/clipe96Spec: https://github.com/daaaave-ATX/clipe96

ClipEgg：我们将复制与囤积混淆了