问HN：你相信外星人正在访问地球吗？
这里面有一些细微差别。我们将“外星人”定义为“非人类的意识”。就个人而言，我认为外星人假说是有效的。也许你觉得超地球（UT）假说更有道理，或者“额外维度”（ED，指的是“来自其他星球/星系”以外的存在）。
事实是，有大量证据可以在法庭上支持关于绑架、遭遇（各种“类型”）和“多传感器数据”的定罪。
实际上，这种现象可以追溯到几个世纪以前，那时我们根本无法想象“逆向工程”（RE'd）出任何类似的东西。因此，必然存在一些超出我们当前人类文明的东西（这并不令人惊讶，如何解释那些由“原始人”建造的巨石100吨砖块结构呢）。
是的，这对一些人来说可能是“挑衅”的（也许）。这正是重点。并不是对立，而是单纯地“激发”一种思考——更确切地说，是一个问题——“现实的本质是什么？”与我们及我们的星球互动的“更高”/“更优越”/“更具技术性的”智能存在与这个问题是自然相连的。
信仰是重要的。因为你的个人经历构成了他人的信仰。而这就是我们所拥有的许多“证据”。
趋势似乎在整体上很明确：信息即将披露。因此，我在这里询问这个“知识性/技术性/好奇性/世俗性”（粗略分类）社区的脉搏。你相信这是真的么？如果相信，为什么？如果不相信，为什么不？
如果我们获得“披露”（即，一个“受人尊敬的国家”的“政府权威”明确声明“外星”接触的现实是确实存在的），你的本体论/世界观会被“打破”还是“稳固”，或者是“其他”？
*为什么有这么多“引号”？我意识到不同术语所关联的多重含义和层次的包袱。引号只是对这种多样性的轻松致意。请如此理解。
基本上，这篇帖子是为了作为一个历史标记，记录在“披露前”时代一个重要集体的温度。因此，这是你在一切揭晓之前记录你官方观点的机会。你怎么看？
我对此非常感兴趣。
查看原文
So there's nuance here. Let's define "Aliens" as "non human sentiences". Personally, I think ET hypothesis is valid. Maybe you feel UT (ultra-terrestrial) hypothesis makes more sesne. Or "ED" ( extra-dimensional, as opposed to "from another planet/galaxy").<p>Facts: there's abundance of testimony that would secure conviction in court regarding abductions, encounters (of variosu "kinds"), and "multi-sensor data".<p>Truth is, it goes back centuries, before we could concievably have "RE'd" (reverse-engineered) anything similar. So there has to be something external to our current human civilization (not so surprising, how can you explain how megalithic 100-ton bricks structures were build by "primitives").<p>Yes, this is "provocative" (perhaps) for some on HN. That's the point. not adversarial, but simply to "provoke" a thought - rather, a question - "what is" the nature of reality? The existence of a "higher"/superior/more technological sentient intelligence interacting with us and our planet is a natural pairing with that question.<p>Belief is important. Because, your personal experience constitutes, for others, a belief. And that's much of the "evidence" we have.<p>Trend seems clear in gestalt: disclsoure is coming. So I ask here to take the pulse of this "intellectual/technical/curious/secular" (corase categroties) community. Do you believe this is real? If so, why? If not, why not?<p>If we were to get "DISCLOSURE" (ie, the "government authroity" of a "respect country" stating unequivocally that the reality of "alien" contact is true) woudl your ontology/worldview be "shattered" or "robust", or "otehr"?<p>*why so many "airquotes"? I recognize the plurality of meanings and layers of baggage associated with different terms. THe air-quotes are simply a glib nod to such multiplicity. Take as such, s'il vous plais.<p>Basically this post is to serve as a historical marker for taking the temperature of a significant collective in the "pre-disclosure" era. So this is your chance to record your official viewpoint, before it all comes down. What you say?<p>I am very interested.