请问HN：在构建变得如此简单的情况下，SaaS的未来会是什么样的？
在过去的三到四个月里，我注意到自己有一个模式：当我在YC上看到一个有趣的SaaS产品发布时，我会尝试一下，如果喜欢的话，便会使用它。这些产品通常是一些前沿的AI工具，实际上只是大型语言模型（LLM）的包装，具备一定的智能能力。我并不想贬低它们，因为它们往往能让我的职业生活更加顺畅和轻松。
但随着我使用时间的延长，我作为重度用户会发现越来越多的问题，并开始理解它们的具体工作原理。通常在我的第一个月订阅到期之前，如果我觉得这个工具有用，我不会续订，而是会花一个周末使用最新的SOTA LLM在Cursor或VCcode上构建出我需要的核心功能，然后再也不回去使用那个服务。通常即使作为重度用户，如果某个SaaS有10到20个功能，我实际上只需要其中的5个。而且我可以再添加2到3个他们永远不会开发的功能。
所以我自然在想，还有多少其他人也在这样做，这种现象对整个SaaS市场又有什么影响。
查看原文
In the past two 3-4 months, I noticed a pattern with myself, where I see an interesting SaaS being launched here on YC, I try it out and I like it. Often these are more cutting edge AI tools; which still are really just LLM wrappers with agentic capabilities. I don't want to downplay them, as they are often products that make my professional life smoother and easier.<p>But the longer I use them, the more issues I notice with them through becoming a power-user and start to understand exactly how they work. Then usually before my first months subscription runs out; if I find them useful, I do not renew the subscription, but I spend a weekend with the latest SOTA LLM in Cursor or VCcode to build out the core capabilities for myself, and then never go back to the service. Often, even as a power-user, if some SaaS has 10-20 features, I really only need 5 of them. And then I can add 2-3 more that they wouldn't ever build.<p>So quite naturally I am wondering, how many other people are doing this, and how this reflects on the whole SaaS landscape.