问HN：为什么每个B2B SaaS都必须看起来像Linear/Stripe？
我是一个创始人（也是前建筑师），正在构建一个物流操作系统。最近，我收到了反馈，称我的网站看起来“便宜且丑陋”，因为我使用了衬线字体和雕刻风格的美学，而不是标准的无衬线“清洁科技”外观。
我的初衷是想营造一种“探索时代”的氛围，因为人工智能时代感觉像是在开辟未知的领域。但用户似乎习惯于只信任“标准蓝色SaaS用户界面”。
我想问HN：一个B2B工具是否必须遵循“标准现代用户界面”才能被认真对待？还是在企业软件中还有空间容纳独特甚至可能引发争议的美学？
我正在考虑是妥协重新设计成“无聊但安全”，还是坚持我们的灵魂。希望听听你们对“品牌独特性与用户界面熟悉度”的看法。
查看原文
I'm a founder (and ex-architect) building a logistics OS. Recently, I received feedback that my site looks "cheap and ugly" because I used Serif fonts and an engraving style aesthetic instead of the standard Sans-Serif "Clean Tech" look.<p>My intent was to evoke the "Age of Exploration" vibe, since the AI era feels like charting unknown territories. But users seem conditioned to trust only "Standard Blue SaaS UI."<p>My question to HN: Does a B2B tool have to follow the "Standard Modern UI" to be taken seriously? Or is there room for distinctive, maybe even polarizing, aesthetics in enterprise software?<p>I'm debating whether to cave in and redesign to "boring but safe" or double down on our soul. Would love to hear your thoughts on "Brand Distinctiveness vs. UI Familiarity."