谁使用过PR代码审查工具？哪些方面有效，哪些方面无效？
我对人们在拉取请求（PR）代码审查中与人工和自动化审查者的经历很感兴趣。<p>对于那些使用过PR审查工具或机器人的人：<p>你们觉得哪些方面实际上是有帮助的？<p>哪些又让人感到烦恼或适得其反？<p>在什么情况下你们开始不再关注反馈？<p>我特别想了解人们在审查中如何平衡信号与噪声，以及总结、内联评论或选择性深入讨论在实践中哪种效果更好。<p>我只是想了解真实的使用模式和痛点，并不是为了推广任何东西。很高兴倾听大家的分享。
查看原文
I’m curious about people’s experiences with pull request code reviewers, both human and automated.<p>For those who have used PR review tools or bots:<p>What did you actually find helpful?<p>What ended up being annoying or counterproductive?<p>At what point did you stop paying attention to the feedback?<p>I’m particularly interested in how people balance signal vs noise in reviews, and whether summaries, inline comments, or opt-in depth work better in practice.<p>Asking to understand real usage patterns and pain points, not to promote anything. Happy to just listen.