社区对70美元的游戏有影响力吗？
我一直在思考游戏价格不断上涨的问题，但玩家似乎除了“还是买了”或“跳过”之外并没有太多选择。
我反复想到的是社区所扮演的角色。模组、服务器、比赛、指南、Discord群组等为游戏增添了大量价值，但这些都是非正式的，当一款游戏衰退时，这些价值似乎就消失了。
我在想是否有办法让社区本身变得更加持久，这样玩家就不会感到必须不断购买新游戏才能保持参与感。
我并不是在谈论投资或替代金钱，而是更像是认可贡献，并将价值保留在社区内部，而不是所有东西都与发售销售挂钩。
这可能是个愚蠢的想法，或者在某个地方已经解决了，但我很好奇人们认为这种想法在哪些方面会出现问题，或者是否有实际成功的例子。
查看原文
<p><pre><code> I’ve been thinking a lot about how game prices keep going up, but players don’t really seem to have many options besides “buy it anyway” or “skip it.”
</code></pre>
What I keep coming back to is the role communities already play. Mods, servers, tournaments, guides, Discords, etc. add a ton of value to games, but its all informal and kind of disappears when a game dies.<p>I’m wondering if there’s a way communities themselves could become more persistent, so players feel less pressure to constantly buy new games just to stay engaged.<p>Not talking about investments or replacing money, more like recognizing contribution and keeping value inside a community instead of everything being tied to launch sales.<p>This might be a dumb idea or already solved somewhere, but I’m curious where people think this kind of falls apart, or if there are examples that actually worked.