Oberon 等人诉 Rust
您好，
我最近看到几年前的这个讨论串：https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34501352
我特别对vidarh的评论感兴趣，评论开头是：“你已经得到了答案：简单性。你一直在忽视它。”
我非常想知道这个人对Rust的看法。Rust比Oberon或它的后代更好吗？
我听说Rust是一个庞大的语言。从这个定义来看，更简单的语言应该更好，对吧？然而，Rust是一个重要的语言，而Oberon则显得有些过时？
我会继续寻找，也许会尝试直接联系他/她（或其他人）。
查看原文
Greetings,<p>I recently came accross this thread from a few years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34501352<p>I am interested, in particular, by the comment by vidarh, that starts with:<p>"You've been given the answer already: Simplicity. You keep ignoring it."<p>I find myself highly interested in what this person would have to say about rust. Is it better than, for example, oberon, or it's descendents?<p>I have heard that Rust is a big language. By that definition, a simpler one must be better, right? And yet rust is a big thing, and .. oberon is ..dusty?<p>I will keep on searching, and maybe attempt to contact him/her/(other?) directly.