问HN：有没有人愿意为一个没有广告或数据收集的社交网络付费？
大多数大型社交网络依赖于广告和数据收集，这使得它们在算法、用户参与优化和追求规模方面不遗余力。我经常看到对此的抱怨，但使用情况很少发生变化。许多过去尝试创建“更好”社交网络的努力似乎都停滞不前，尽管出发点是良好的。
我很好奇大家对此的看法：一个专注于现有关系的小型付费社交网络是否有现实的采用机会，还是说网络效应和用户行为使其根本无法运作？
如果你认为它会失败，真正的障碍通常是什么：定价、缺乏新颖性、转换成本，还是其他因素？
我希望得到的是为什么这行不通的理由，而不是鼓励。
查看原文
Most large social networks rely on advertising and data collection, which pushes them toward algorithms, engagement optimization, and scale at all costs.<p>I keep seeing complaints about this, but usage rarely changes. A lot of past attempts at “better” social networks seem to stall despite good intentions.<p>I am curious how people here think about this:<p>Would a small, paid social network focused on existing relationships have any realistic chance of adoption, or do network effects and user behavior make this fundamentally unworkable?<p>If you think it fails, what tends to be the real blocker: pricing, lack of novelty, switching costs, or something else?<p>I am looking for reasons this does not work, not encouragement.