在实际操作中，完成SOC 2认证最困难的部分是什么？
嗨，HN，
我很想听听那些经历过（或正在经历）SOC 2的创始人、工程师和顾问们的看法。理论上听起来很简单：控制、证据、审计，但实际上似乎很快就会变得复杂。
我听到的一些人所面临的挑战包括：将抽象的控制转化为实际的工程工作流程；知道什么程度的证据是“足够的”；在审计结束后保持更新；协调工程、安全和运营之间的关系；处理工具、电子表格和顾问之间的关系。
对于那些已经完成这一过程的人：
- 哪个部分花费的时间最多？
- 哪些方面比预期更痛苦？
- 在开始之前你希望自己知道些什么？
我并不是想推销什么，真心想了解真正的难点在哪里。
谢谢！
查看原文
Hi HN,<p>I’m curious to hear from founders, engineers, and consultants who’ve gone through (or are going through) SOC 2. On paper it sounds straightforward: controls, evidence, audit, but in practice it seems to get messy quickly.<p>Some things I’ve heard people struggle with: translating abstract controls into real engineering workflows; knowing what level of evidence is “enough”; keeping things updated once the audit is over; coordinating between engineering, security, and ops; dealing with tools vs. spreadsheets vs. consultants<p>For those who’ve done it:
- What part took the most time?
- What was more painful than expected?
- What did you wish you had known before starting?<p>Not trying to sell anything, genuinely trying to understand where the real friction is.<p>Thanks!