问HN：Archive.today的奇怪行为？
archive.today 最近（我大约三天前注意到的）开始自动向某个人的博客的 CAPTCHA 页面发起请求。以下是我所说内容的截图：https://files.catbox.moe/20jsle.png
相关的 JavaScript 代码是：
```javascript
setInterval(function() {
fetch("https://gyrovague.com/?s=" + Math.round(new Date().getTime() % 10000000), {
referrerPolicy: "no-referrer",
mode: "no-cors"
});
}, 300);
```
查看这个博客，似乎只有一篇文章提到 archive.today——“archive.today：追踪互联网神秘游击档案员”（https://gyrovague.com/2023/08/05/archive-today-on-the-trail-of-the-mysterious-guerrilla-archivist-of-the-internet），在这篇文章中，博客的作者挖掘了一些关于 archive 拥有者的信息。
所以这或许是一种报复/拒绝服务攻击尝试/故意浪费他们带宽以回应这篇文章？也许是试图让他们沉默并迫使他们删除文章？但如果真是这样，我有很多疑问。比如，为什么 archive 的拥有者会在文章发布 <i>2.5 年</i> 后才这样做？或者他们为什么会这样做，他们难道不知道斯特赖桑效应吗？
我很困惑。
查看原文
archive.today has recently (I noticed this, like, 3 days ago) started automatically making requests to someone's personal blog on their CAPTCHA page. Here's a screenshot of what I'm talking about: https://files.catbox.moe/20jsle.png<p>The relevant JS is:<p><pre><code> setInterval(function() {
fetch("https://gyrovague.com/?s=" + Math.round(new Date().getTime() % 10000000), {
referrerPolicy: "no-referrer",
mode: "no-cors"
});
}, 300);
</code></pre>
Looking at this blog, there seems to be exactly one article mentioning archive.today - "archive.today: On the trail of the mysterious guerrilla archivist of the Internet" (https://gyrovague.com/2023/08/05/archive-today-on-the-trail-of-the-mysterious-guerrilla-archivist-of-the-internet/), where the person running the blog digs up some information about archive's owner.<p>So perhaps this is some kind of revenge/DOS attack attempt/deliberately wasting their bandwidth in response to this article? Maybe an attempt to silence them and force to delete their article? But if it is, then I have so many questions. Like, why would the owner of the archive do that <i>2.5 years</i> after the article was published? Or why would they even do that in the first place, do they not know about Streisand effect?<p>I'm confused.