请问HN：如果人工智能能够做数学和计算机科学，我应该教我的孩子什么？
我在家教育我的孩子。他和我一样对数学和计算机科学感兴趣，而且他在这方面非常出色。
我一直在鼓励他在这两个领域追求学术成功。部分原因是我在其他方面帮不上什么忙，部分原因是他喜欢这些，部分原因是我在这些领域找到了人生的一些成功。
然而，我每天都无法避免看到关于人工智能如何解决人类此前未能解决的厄尔多斯问题的文章，如何在国际数学奥林匹克中获得金牌，如何在微软取代程序员，甚至取代建筑师的报道。
这让我真的开始质疑我在做什么。
当然，人们告诉我重要的是训练大脑，关键不在于技能本身，而在于学习如何学习等等……也许这是对的，但我总觉得自己正在把孩子引向一条直接撞上坚固砖墙的道路。
那么，还有什么替代方案呢？
整天玩视频游戏，等待普遍基本收入的到来？
鼓励他转向人文学科，而他对这些并没有强烈的兴趣，我也不擅长教授，而且我从小就被教导这些领域不会带来好的就业机会？
忘掉数学和计算机科学，教他如何建立和经营企业，禁止阅读任何表明人工智能可能也会接管这些领域的文章？
闭上眼睛，不去听内心的这种感觉，继续教他Python生成器和线性代数？
有没有人有什么建议或随意的评论？
查看原文
I am home-schooling my kid. He shares my interest in math and CS, and he's really good at it.<p>I've been cheering him on a path towards academic success in these 2 fields. In parts because I am not much use at anything else, in parts because he likes it, in parts because that's where I found some measure of success in life.<p>However, I can't go through a day without reading another article about how AI solved an Erdös problem previously unsolved by humans[1], is getting gold medals at International Mathematical Olympiads[2], is replacing coders at Microsoft[3] and even architects[4].<p>This makes me really question what I am doing.<p>Sure, people tell me what matters is training your brain, it's never about the skill itself, but learning to learn, etc...
Maybe that's right, but somehow, I can't shake the feeling that I am setting my kid on a path that leads directly into a solid brick wall.<p>What are the alternatives though?<p>Play video games all day long and wait for Universal Basic Income to kick in?<p>Encourage him to pivot towards humanities subject he has no strong interest in, that I would not be great at teaching, and that I've been taught young do not lead to great job opportunities?<p>Forget math and CS, and teach him how to build and run businesses, banning the reading of any article that shows AI might also be taking this over?<p>Close my eyes, do not listen to this feeling inside, and continue to teach python generators and linear algebra?<p>Does anyone have any suggestion, or random comment?<p>[1]: https://officechai.com/ai/gpt-5-2-and-harmonic-appear-to-have-autonomously-solved-an-erdos-problem-that-had-been-unsolved-by-humans-thus-far/<p>[2]: https://intuitionlabs.ai/articles/ai-reasoning-math-olympiad-imo<p>[3]: https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/microsoft-ceo-says-up-to-30-of-the-companys-code-was-written-by-ai/<p>[4]: https://x.com/rakyll/status/2007239758158975130