问HN:Claude Code对ADHD有害吗?
我觉得这可能是个问题。
我有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)。我在这里发过一些关于这个的帖子。其中一个帖子很有意思,有142条评论: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46610156。
Claude很强大。这一周感觉它的能力提升了一个档次(在较长的任务上运行20分钟,然后能正确处理事情)。我不知道它何时、如何会取代开发者,我知道这里很多人对此有很强烈的看法。但对我来说,它就像火箭燃料。
但同时我也有ADHD。我意识到我对一个产品、一个应用、一个网站、一个想法的思考,已经不再只是一个酷点子的列表。现在我可以做事情了。但我真的需要这些事情吗?
所有这些活动都是健康的吗?
给你一个概念,过去六个月我做了:
- 一个ChatGPT的包装工具,带有一些附加功能和大量系统提示工作,并以每年3万英镑的顾问费卖给了一家大型IT公司。
- 一个工具,可以处理一份数据表(想象一下人/公司/潜在客户数据),允许你使用占位符构建提示,然后通过AI提示运行每一行/查询。需要30,000家公司的网站和邮寄地址。很简单。他们支付了我们5万英镑(他们还获得了一些其他的市场营销服务)。
- 我为我们的SEO团队构建了一个内部工具,可以一键处理博客文章的所有页面优化和一些离页优化。这样他们可以做更有趣的工作。这个工具有点用,但他们不怎么使用。
- 我构建了一个小工具,可以推送网址,最后得到一个个性化的两人播客(类似GoogleLM风格),这样我可以在骑车回家的路上听我没时间阅读的内容。这个AI API是一个第三方工具,功能很不错,和GoogleLM很相似。这个想法很酷,但我并没有使用它。
- 我构建了一个AI驱动的内容写作工具。分为两个面板。左侧粘贴内容简报,右侧镜像显示。选择左侧的文本并针对选择进行提示(“将这些要点转化为重点突出数据和冲击力的段落”),右侧面板就会出现。慢慢地,左侧的简报变成了右侧的正式内容。支持背景文档的RAG。我现在几乎用它写任何东西。
- 为我的业务制作了一个互动AI报告。“20位AI专家及其建议对你的意义”。网站链接包含读者的编码工作邮箱,我们会抓取LinkedIn并在他们到达之前个性化文本。我们将其用作潜在客户生成,这个想法很酷。
还有更多,我就不继续说了。
但我刚刚构建(并打磨、并“发布”)了一个工具 - https://tryultrathink.com - 使用浏览器扩展和Electron桌面小部件,使得捕捉任何想法、笔记、文本、音频、消息、链接等变得简单。然后你可以排序、搜索、使用AI等……这很酷。我觉得这是一个ADHD患者的梦想。我每天都在使用它。
但我制作它是为了帮助我应对ADHD的“不断涌现的思维”。我用Claude Code来制作它。我认为Claude Code实际上是个问题。
其他人怎么看?当你的“列表”可以由AI代理自主处理时,这是否强大?深入研究又是一个问题。当我有一个想法时,为什么不对其进行深入研究或专业提示,获取一些背景信息?这样当我回到这个想法时,我可以详细阐述。我可以。那么为什么不呢?也许水的使用是原因?这是个不错的理由。
一方面,未来(基本上使用现有的AI技术,甚至不需要更先进的技术)是很酷的。我可以保存每一个想法,而在我回到其中一个想法之前,它已经被研究/构建/以某种方式进展了。这很酷。这是高效的。
另一方面,这也是一个ADHD的噩梦。我无法入睡。我在不断构建,但并不总是能销售、测试、让人们使用。前几天我启动了Claude Code,把它放在我的自行车篮子里,让它在我骑行时继续运行。我甚至在车上把我的笔记本电脑放在副驾驶座上,在红灯时查看。这不太好吧?
与此同时,我会继续使用ultrathink(是的,我以Claude Code的名字命名它)。如果你想试用,可以联系我。也许它能帮到你?
查看原文
I think it might be.<p>I have ADHD. I've posted a little here on that. This one was cool, 142 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46610156.<p>Claude is powerful. This week feels like it has moved up a notch (running for 20mins on longer tasks and then getting stuff right). I don't know if/when/how it replaces devs, I know a lot on here have very strong thoughts on it. But for someone like me it is like rocket fuel.<p>But then ADHD. I've realised a thought I have for a product, an app, a website, an idea just no longer sits in a list of cool ideas. Now I can do stuff. But do I need this stuff?<p>Is all this activity healthy?<p>To give you an idea last 6 months I've built:<p>- A ChatGPT wrapper with a few bells and whistles and lots of system prompt work and sold it to a big IT company on a £30k annual retainer<p>- A tool that takes a spreadsheet of data (think people/company/lead data) and allows you to construct a prompt using placeholders for any of the data then run each line/query through an AI prompt. Need websites and mailing address for 30k companies. Easy. They paid us £50k (they got a few other bits of marketing as well for this).<p>- I built an internal tool for our SEO team which takes a blog post and does all the on-page, and some off page optimisations for them at click of a button. So they can do more interesting work. It sort of works, but they don't use it.<p>- I built a widget that I can push urls at and at end of the day get a personalised 2 person podcast (GoogleLM style) so I can listen on my cycle home to what I couldn't read. The AI API is some 3rd party tool, its neat very like GoogleLM. It's a cool idea but I don't use it<p>- I built a AI power content writing tool. Two panes. Paste a content brief in left and it is mirrored right. Select text left and prompt against the selection ("Turn these bullet points into a flesh out para focusing on the stats and shock of the data") and it appears in right hand pane. Slowly your brief left turns into proper content right. Supports RAG for background docs. I use it to write almost anything these days.<p>- An interactive AI report for my business. "20 AI experts and what their advice means for you". The link to site includes an encoded work email of reader, we scrape Linkedin and personalise text before they arrive. We use it as leadgen, its cool.<p>There are more, I won't go on.<p>But I did just build (and polish, and put "out there") a tool - https://tryultrathink.com - that uses a browser extension and electron desktop widget to make it easy to capture any thought, note, text, audio, message, link etc. Then you can sort, search, AI etc.. it's cool. It's an ADHD dream I think. I'm using it every day.<p>But I made it to help my ADHD "constant stream of thoughts". And I used Claude Code to make it. And I think Claude Code is actually the problem.<p>What do others think? Is it powerful when your "list" can actually be worked on autonomously by AI agents? Deep research is another one. When I have a thought, why would I not run a deep research or Pro prompt at it and get some background. So when I come to it I can detail. I can. So why not? Maybe water use is the reason? That's a good reason.<p>On the one hand the future (using basically existing AI tech, not even needing anything more advanced) is cool. I can save every thought and before I come back to one of them it has been researched/built/some how progressed. That's cool. That's productive.<p>On the other hand its a ADHD nightmare. I can't sleep. I building so much with not always selling, testing, getting people to use. The other I fired up Claude Code and put it in my bike basket so it carried on running on my cycle. I even had my laptop on passenger seat in car and checked it at lights. That's bad right?<p>In the mean time I will keep using ultrathink (yes I named it in honour of Claude Code). Hit me up for a free trial. Maybe it can help you?