问HN:Claude Code对ADHD有害吗?

1作者: chriswright166422 天前原帖
我觉得这可能是个问题。 我有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)。我在这里发过一些关于这个的帖子。其中一个帖子很有意思,有142条评论: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46610156。 Claude很强大。这一周感觉它的能力提升了一个档次(在较长的任务上运行20分钟,然后能正确处理事情)。我不知道它何时、如何会取代开发者,我知道这里很多人对此有很强烈的看法。但对我来说,它就像火箭燃料。 但同时我也有ADHD。我意识到我对一个产品、一个应用、一个网站、一个想法的思考,已经不再只是一个酷点子的列表。现在我可以做事情了。但我真的需要这些事情吗? 所有这些活动都是健康的吗? 给你一个概念,过去六个月我做了: - 一个ChatGPT的包装工具,带有一些附加功能和大量系统提示工作,并以每年3万英镑的顾问费卖给了一家大型IT公司。 - 一个工具,可以处理一份数据表(想象一下人/公司/潜在客户数据),允许你使用占位符构建提示,然后通过AI提示运行每一行/查询。需要30,000家公司的网站和邮寄地址。很简单。他们支付了我们5万英镑(他们还获得了一些其他的市场营销服务)。 - 我为我们的SEO团队构建了一个内部工具,可以一键处理博客文章的所有页面优化和一些离页优化。这样他们可以做更有趣的工作。这个工具有点用,但他们不怎么使用。 - 我构建了一个小工具,可以推送网址,最后得到一个个性化的两人播客(类似GoogleLM风格),这样我可以在骑车回家的路上听我没时间阅读的内容。这个AI API是一个第三方工具,功能很不错,和GoogleLM很相似。这个想法很酷,但我并没有使用它。 - 我构建了一个AI驱动的内容写作工具。分为两个面板。左侧粘贴内容简报,右侧镜像显示。选择左侧的文本并针对选择进行提示(“将这些要点转化为重点突出数据和冲击力的段落”),右侧面板就会出现。慢慢地,左侧的简报变成了右侧的正式内容。支持背景文档的RAG。我现在几乎用它写任何东西。 - 为我的业务制作了一个互动AI报告。“20位AI专家及其建议对你的意义”。网站链接包含读者的编码工作邮箱,我们会抓取LinkedIn并在他们到达之前个性化文本。我们将其用作潜在客户生成,这个想法很酷。 还有更多,我就不继续说了。 但我刚刚构建(并打磨、并“发布”)了一个工具 - https://tryultrathink.com - 使用浏览器扩展和Electron桌面小部件,使得捕捉任何想法、笔记、文本、音频、消息、链接等变得简单。然后你可以排序、搜索、使用AI等……这很酷。我觉得这是一个ADHD患者的梦想。我每天都在使用它。 但我制作它是为了帮助我应对ADHD的“不断涌现的思维”。我用Claude Code来制作它。我认为Claude Code实际上是个问题。 其他人怎么看?当你的“列表”可以由AI代理自主处理时,这是否强大?深入研究又是一个问题。当我有一个想法时,为什么不对其进行深入研究或专业提示,获取一些背景信息?这样当我回到这个想法时,我可以详细阐述。我可以。那么为什么不呢?也许水的使用是原因?这是个不错的理由。 一方面,未来(基本上使用现有的AI技术,甚至不需要更先进的技术)是很酷的。我可以保存每一个想法,而在我回到其中一个想法之前,它已经被研究/构建/以某种方式进展了。这很酷。这是高效的。 另一方面,这也是一个ADHD的噩梦。我无法入睡。我在不断构建,但并不总是能销售、测试、让人们使用。前几天我启动了Claude Code,把它放在我的自行车篮子里,让它在我骑行时继续运行。我甚至在车上把我的笔记本电脑放在副驾驶座上,在红灯时查看。这不太好吧? 与此同时,我会继续使用ultrathink(是的,我以Claude Code的名字命名它)。如果你想试用,可以联系我。也许它能帮到你?
查看原文
I think it might be.<p>I have ADHD. I&#x27;ve posted a little here on that. This one was cool, 142 comments: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=46610156.<p>Claude is powerful. This week feels like it has moved up a notch (running for 20mins on longer tasks and then getting stuff right). I don&#x27;t know if&#x2F;when&#x2F;how it replaces devs, I know a lot on here have very strong thoughts on it. But for someone like me it is like rocket fuel.<p>But then ADHD. I&#x27;ve realised a thought I have for a product, an app, a website, an idea just no longer sits in a list of cool ideas. Now I can do stuff. But do I need this stuff?<p>Is all this activity healthy?<p>To give you an idea last 6 months I&#x27;ve built:<p>- A ChatGPT wrapper with a few bells and whistles and lots of system prompt work and sold it to a big IT company on a £30k annual retainer<p>- A tool that takes a spreadsheet of data (think people&#x2F;company&#x2F;lead data) and allows you to construct a prompt using placeholders for any of the data then run each line&#x2F;query through an AI prompt. Need websites and mailing address for 30k companies. Easy. They paid us £50k (they got a few other bits of marketing as well for this).<p>- I built an internal tool for our SEO team which takes a blog post and does all the on-page, and some off page optimisations for them at click of a button. So they can do more interesting work. It sort of works, but they don&#x27;t use it.<p>- I built a widget that I can push urls at and at end of the day get a personalised 2 person podcast (GoogleLM style) so I can listen on my cycle home to what I couldn&#x27;t read. The AI API is some 3rd party tool, its neat very like GoogleLM. It&#x27;s a cool idea but I don&#x27;t use it<p>- I built a AI power content writing tool. Two panes. Paste a content brief in left and it is mirrored right. Select text left and prompt against the selection (&quot;Turn these bullet points into a flesh out para focusing on the stats and shock of the data&quot;) and it appears in right hand pane. Slowly your brief left turns into proper content right. Supports RAG for background docs. I use it to write almost anything these days.<p>- An interactive AI report for my business. &quot;20 AI experts and what their advice means for you&quot;. The link to site includes an encoded work email of reader, we scrape Linkedin and personalise text before they arrive. We use it as leadgen, its cool.<p>There are more, I won&#x27;t go on.<p>But I did just build (and polish, and put &quot;out there&quot;) a tool - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tryultrathink.com - that uses a browser extension and electron desktop widget to make it easy to capture any thought, note, text, audio, message, link etc. Then you can sort, search, AI etc.. it&#x27;s cool. It&#x27;s an ADHD dream I think. I&#x27;m using it every day.<p>But I made it to help my ADHD &quot;constant stream of thoughts&quot;. And I used Claude Code to make it. And I think Claude Code is actually the problem.<p>What do others think? Is it powerful when your &quot;list&quot; can actually be worked on autonomously by AI agents? Deep research is another one. When I have a thought, why would I not run a deep research or Pro prompt at it and get some background. So when I come to it I can detail. I can. So why not? Maybe water use is the reason? That&#x27;s a good reason.<p>On the one hand the future (using basically existing AI tech, not even needing anything more advanced) is cool. I can save every thought and before I come back to one of them it has been researched&#x2F;built&#x2F;some how progressed. That&#x27;s cool. That&#x27;s productive.<p>On the other hand its a ADHD nightmare. I can&#x27;t sleep. I building so much with not always selling, testing, getting people to use. The other I fired up Claude Code and put it in my bike basket so it carried on running on my cycle. I even had my laptop on passenger seat in car and checked it at lights. That&#x27;s bad right?<p>In the mean time I will keep using ultrathink (yes I named it in honour of Claude Code). Hit me up for a free trial. Maybe it can help you?