问HN：为什么我们免受僵尸网络驱动的烦扰诉讼的影响？
一些2000年代的科幻作品（比如《加速世界》和《小鸡快跑》）预测，随着人工智能技术的发展，企业之间会出现自动化的垃圾诉讼现象，因为人工智能能够创建看似真实的虚假或一次性原告身份，这些身份可以提起数十起诉讼，从而累积法律费用，而不易追踪到其发起者。
我们似乎避免了这种负面结果，可能是由于法律系统中的某种技术专长。今天的攻击面是否得到了良好的防御，还是说我们仅仅是通过模糊性而得以安全？
查看原文
Some 2000s science fiction (off the top of my head there's Accelerando, Chicken Little) predicted that AI technology would produce a rise in automated spam litigation by companies targeting each other, as AI became capable of creating convincing-looking fake or throwaway plaintiff identities which could file dozens of suits to rack up legal costs without being easily traceable to the originator.<p>We've avoided that negative outcome, presumably by some kind of technical expertise in the legal system. Is it a well-defended attack surface today, or is it something we're safe from through obscurity?