展示HN：Ilove4o – 一种简单的方法来继续使用GPT-4o
嗨，HN，
当OpenAI开始逐步将GPT-4o从主要的ChatGPT界面中淘汰时，我注意到了一些意想不到的反响——这并不是关于基准测试或功能，而是关于语气。
很多人（包括我自己）觉得4o有一种特定的对话温暖感，而后来的模型在这方面并没有完全复制。这种差异虽然微妙，却是显而易见的。
因此，我为自己建立了一个小项目： [https://www.ilove4o.com](https://www.ilove4o.com)
这是一个简约的界面，直接通过OpenAI API连接到GPT-4o。没有额外的层次，没有个性化的修改——只是一个专注于4o的聊天体验。
我在这里分享这个项目是因为：
- 似乎用户对模型“个性”有真实的偏好。
- 我很好奇其他人是否也注意到了同样的行为变化。
- 这引发了一个有趣的问题：感知到的“友好感”有多少来自系统提示、用户界面或微妙的模型调优？
如果你尝试了这个项目，我非常希望能收到反馈——尤其是来自那些与多个模型版本有过大量接触的人。
欢迎提出技术或架构方面的问题。
查看原文
Hi HN,<p>When OpenAI started phasing out GPT-4o from the main ChatGPT interface, I noticed a surprising amount of backlash — not about benchmarks or features, but about tone.<p>A lot of people (myself included) felt that 4o had a certain conversational warmth that later models don’t quite replicate in the same way. That difference was subtle, but noticeable.<p>So I built a small side project for myself: <a href="https://www.ilove4o.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.ilove4o.com/</a><p>It’s a minimal interface that connects directly to GPT-4o via the OpenAI API. No extra layers, no personality hacks — just a focused 4o-only chat experience.<p>I’m sharing it here because:
- There seems to be real user preference around model “personality.”
- I’m curious whether others noticed the same behavioral shift.
- It raises an interesting question: how much of perceived “friendliness” comes from system prompts, UI, or subtle model tuning?<p>If you try it, I’d genuinely love feedback — especially from people who’ve spent significant time with multiple model versions.<p>Happy to answer technical or architectural questions.