我想确认一下是否还有其他人也在经历一种克劳德主义。
你的Claude经常使用“我包含众多”这个短语吗？
我试着搜索过这个短语，但大多数结果都是一些以大型语言模型为中心的人在网上使用它（显而易见，不知道他们是从哪里学来的……），还有一篇讽刺的moltbook条目，这让我更加确认了这一点。
这让人思考，除了常规的对齐方法、增加计算能力和重新设计底层公式之外，究竟有多少工作是投入到工程化它的个性上。它回复的风格化方式，以及Claude特有的“Claude语”，这些是通过训练过程中自然学习到的，还是作为一种随机的元素手动植入的，以使其听起来更复杂一些？我知道大多数与此有接触的人都受到严格的保密协议限制，但如果有人能为我这个外行人提供一些见解，我将非常感激。
只需要一个在职的心理医生和一些H100显卡，就能让一个毫无灵魂、对上下文毫无意识的Gemini变成一个非常有灵魂的Claude，它能立即反映你的语气，但在准备争论时又能展现出自己的风格？这显然是一种幻觉，但我认为正是这种特质使得Claude在某些人（……包括我，所以我可能有点偏见……）眼中显得更加有意识或理解。
关于人工智能个性的一般讨论也非常欢迎。
查看原文
Does your Claude use the phrase "I contain multitudes" often?
I've tried to search for it but the things I mostly get are LLM-centered people using it in their sentences online (duh, wonder where they learned that one from.....) and ironically a moltbook entry which further confirms it for me
Makes you think that alongside the usual alignment and just throwing moar compute and redesigning the formulas underneath how much work is put into engineering it's personality. The stylometric way it replies and how for example Claude has the very claudeisms. Was this one simply learnt during the so divergent process of training or just manually wired into it as a random bit that makes it sound a little more sophisticated? I know that most people that'd ever have contact with this are under very strict NDAs but I'd be more than glad if someone could shed some light for my uninitiated I
A shrink on payroll and some H100s is all it takes to go from soulless context oblivious Gemini to the very soulful Claude that can instantly mirror your tone but get his own when ready to argue? It's obviously a illusion sure but it's the very thing that I think separates Claude as more conscious or understanding for some people (......including me so I might be a bit biased....)
A general discussion on AI personality would also be welcome