问HN:围绕一个开源AI代理平台建立公司是否现实?

1作者: dimitrismrtzs4 个月前原帖
我已经运行了一个包含大约40个服务的Proxmox实验室一段时间了。在过去的一年里,我建立了一个AI代理平台,负责管理我的基础设施和处理业务运营——文档、电话、日程安排、监控等等。这个平台将Claude Code CLI作为执行引擎,并在其上构建了自定义的MCP服务器。 这一切最初是我为一个创业公司开发的内部工具,但老实说,这个平台的实用性远超这个创业公司本身。我正在认真考虑将其开源,并全职投入其中。我将其视为一种类似于Home Assistant的业务运营工具——你可以自托管,AI代理负责处理你的运营事务。 不过,我的担忧是可持续性。我无法现实地在业余时间维护这样的项目——如果我决定做,就必须全力以赴。这里有没有人建立过或见过围绕开源工具在AI领域的真实商业模式?你会选择什么许可证?我一直在考虑修改版的Apache 2.0(Dify使用的许可证)与BSL,但说实话,我不太确定哪个更合适。 非常希望能得到有相关经验的人的建议。
查看原文
I&#x27;ve been running a Proxmox lab with around 40 services for a while now. Over the past year I ended up building an AI agent platform that manages my infrastructure and handles business operations — documents, phone calls, scheduling, monitoring, that kind of thing. It wraps Claude Code CLI as the execution engine with custom MCP servers on top.<p>The whole thing started as internal tooling for a startup I was working on but honestly the platform ended up being way more useful than the startup itself. I&#x27;m seriously considering open sourcing it and going full time on it. The way I think about it is something like Home Assistant but for business operations — you self-host it and AI agents handle your operations.<p>My concern is sustainability though. I can&#x27;t realistically maintain something like this on the side — if I do it I need to go all in. Has anyone here built or seen a real business around an open source tool in the AI space? What license would you go with? I&#x27;ve been looking at Modified Apache 2.0 (what Dify uses) vs BSL but honestly not sure what makes sense.<p>Would appreciate any advice from people who&#x27;ve dealt with this.