问HN：Anthropic在做什么？
我对Opus 4.7感到无言。这可能是自Windows Vista以来计算机产品最大的质量退步，甚至可能是有史以来最大的退步。
所以，我想问社区一个问题：这里面有什么讲究？
我不相信是出于金钱的考虑，因为他们即将失去大量订阅用户。我几乎无法再为Max付费，经过四个非常沮丧的小时尝试让模型修复代码后，我第一次在几个月内转向了Codex。
我也不相信是出于公司利益的考虑。模型是基础设施的一部分，就像API一样，适用于它们的规则也是相同的。主要是：不要破坏集成。由于新一代模型可能完全打破输出预期，部署它们变成了一项组织工作，而对旧模型的支持则非常糟糕。在某个时刻，这些组织会厌倦“不断适应”。
那么，这里到底有什么讲究呢？
查看原文
I'm without words with Opus 4.7. This is possibly the biggest quality regression of a computer product since Windows Vista. Or maybe ever.<p>So, here is my question to the community: what is the play here?<p>I don't buy the money angle, since they're about to be bleeding subscribers. I hardly can justify paying for Max anymore and switched to Codex at work first time in months after I spent 4 very frustrating hours trying to get the model to fix the code to my liking.<p>I also don't buy the corporate angle. Models are part of infrastructure, like APIs and the same rule apply to them. Mostly: don't break the integrations. Since new generation of models can completely break output expectations, deploying them becomes organizational effort and support for older ones is abysmal. At some point those organizations will get tired of "adapting" all the time.<p>So what's the play here?