请问HN：行业是如何确定每周限制的？
我明白便宜的计算资源不会永远持续下去，但在这一切的AI紧缩中，似乎出现了一些独特的现象。
每周限制
这一政策似乎几乎是凭空而来，但很快就在许多产品中被广泛采用。切断你所支付的基于时间的产品的25%使用时间，感觉在核心概念上与订阅模式是不兼容的。冷却时间和过度使用的限制并不新鲜，但从5小时到5-7天的变化在语气上有着显著的不同。
我很困惑，为什么这会成为一种可接受的做法，最常见的回答就是“购买更多订阅”。
查看原文
I understand that the cheap compute ride wouldn't last forever but something that feels somewhat unique seems to have come about from all of this AI belt tightening.<p>Weekly Limits<p>This policy seemed to come from almost nowhere but was quickly adopted across many products. Cutting off access for 25% of the time based product you've paid for feels like it is just incompatible with a subscription at the core conceptual level. Cooldown times and over-use back-offs are nothing new but there is a drastic difference in tone from 5 hours to 5-7 days.<p>I'm at a loss to see how this became an acceptable practice with the most common answer being "Buy more subs"