大型语言模型能否扩展到通用人工智能？
是否有支持或反对的有力论据？我读了很多，但总是出现相同的论点，比如“它们不思考”、“它们只是下一步的预测者”、“它们不是生物的”。这些论点在某种程度上是有道理的，但并没有明确说明为什么它们无法发展成一个完全智能的系统。像“它们没有意识”和“这只是死数学”这样的论点对我来说没有意义，因为我们自己也不知道意识意味着什么，真正的“思考”是什么。
那么，为什么智能需要生物或有机体呢？如果你们有一些非常好的论据，我很想听听。
查看原文
is there any good argument in favor or against, I have read a lot but there is always the same argument like "they do not think", "they are next work predictors", "they are not biological". Which makes sense to some extent but does not explicitly tell why can't they scale to a completely intelligent system. Arguments like they are not "conscious" and "it's just dead math" doesn't make sense to me because we ourselves do not know what it means to be conscious and what actually is "thinking".
And why is there need for biology or organics for intelligence? If you guys have some really good arguments, I'd love to hear.