问HN：经过审核的市场是否能改善招聘？
我曾经有一位“新”高级经理，他之前只是某个所谓的“七大巨头”中的一名业务开发人员，他知道如何说得头头是道，并且在简历上进行了美化。我试图阻止灾难的发生，但没有成功，数十个项目失败，此外还有其他一些非常棘手的问题。在14个月内造成的损失可能超过了100万美元。在人工智能时代，这种“错误雇佣”的成本甚至更高。我遇到了Mahala.ai，这家公司声称能够将企业与经过审查的高级数据/人工智能人才匹配，并处理一些招聘和行政事务。从理论上讲，这应该能减少双方的噪音，但我很好奇像这样的市场是否真的能提高信号质量，还是只是为候选人与招聘经理之间增加了另一层障碍。你怎么看？
查看原文
I once had a ‘new’ senior manager who was earlier a mere business development in one of the so called ‘Magnificent Seven’,he knew how to talk the talk and he spiced up his resume. I tried to prevent the disaster, but there was no luck, tens of projects failed in addition to other issues that were very nasty. The damage in 14 months might have exceeded $1 million. The cost of succh "bad hire" in the AI era is even higher. I came across Mahala.ai, which claims to match companies with vetted senior Data/AI talent and handle some of the hiring/admin overhead. In theory this should reduce noise for both sides, but I’m curious whether marketplaces like this actually improve signal quality, or just add another layer between candidates and hiring managers. Thoughts?